Wow. There's a huge disparity between the brows on those two. No matter how blurry the first pics are, the thickness of Luigi's brows would be noticeable. The person in that camera footage definitely doesn't have thick eyebrows like Luigi :/
Wedged between the branches of the tree, you hear the parrot-guy call out to you,“Car blue oblay?", you see him hanging by a precariously by a rope over the side of a docked boat, surrounded by angry seagulls.
For me it took getting into therapy and realizing why I would lose control and drink to excess. I understand now that, for me, excessive drinking is a physical manifestation of an underlying problem I'm not confronting. If I drink when I'm not in pain or emotionally distraught, I drink responsibly, but when I am angry/sad/depressed I'll drink uncontrollably. I liken it to taking hallucinogens, specifically mushrooms, if I take mushrooms when I am already feeling bad emotionally, I will have a bad trip, if I take them when I am already happy and in a good mood, I'll have a good trip. It's about being mindful about your state of mind and what you put in your body that can effect that state of mind.
I appreciate the kindness, take care too ;)
Thanks for the kind words!
Yes, I did get into SMART for a time. I found that it was easier to just go to AA since I didn't feel like going through the hassle of maintaining a digital form and having to print it out every time I had to show it to my probation officer.
There have been a lot of successful lawsuits contesting the legality of mandating AA through the courts, in fact, no lawsuit has lost to date. I would have loved to contest it as well, but honestly I live in a small town and the police and courts here are the type to hold a grudge, so I didn't want to draw any unwanted attention. But yeah, it is most definitely a religious organization, no matter how much they try to maintain they aren't.
I had a similar experience myself, I was desperate and was looking for a way out. I initially joined before being mandated by the court, and for a little while I was on board, but after a year or so I got fed up with the methodology and rhetoric of AA. About six months before the mandate I was pretty much through with AA, and then I got a DUI and was forced to go. Which just further brought out my distaste for AA.
Luckily I'm just about finished with the court requirements. I only have a few more weeks of outpatient, and was told by my PO that once I completed the outpatient I'd be off of probation. So, very happy it'll be over soon.
The positive thing was that I did take a break from abusing alcohol and resassessed my relationship with alcohol. I don't intend to stay abstinent, but I do plan on having a healthier relationship with drinking and being mindful of when and how much I do.
Oh man, this is the fucking truth. I'm court mandated to go to AA, and it's driving me up the wall. The steps are ridiculous and the true believers will endlessly drone on about how amazing and effective they are. It's literally just religious fundamentalist ideology (AA itself was created by Bill Wilson, who was part of a religious organization called the Oxford Group, and used their existing principles to create the 12 Steps). The organization is definitely a cult, the largest operating and hiding in plain sight cult in the world. It's crazy how prolific it is and most people don't realize it is a Christian temperance cult.
That does sound equally as torturous.
What?! Doesn't everybody do that?
That's exactly how I felt by Kafka on the Shore. I thought it was a really dreamy, surreal journey. Very unique kind of feel. I remember really liking it, to the extent that I thought he might be my new favorite author. But subsequent works I've tried to get into haven't roped me in like that book unfortunately.
Kafka did, but after that I've had trouble getting over that default setting time and time again. I still have Sputnik from the library, so I might push ahead and see if it lures me in, but I'm still annoyed by the repetitive use of the same motifs.
For sure! Kick ass score! Trying to show me up, eh? :P
Sure, if your issue is that it's okay for corporations to remove protections for hate speech towards marginalized groups, then yes, go get bent. This kind of false equivalence between normalizing hate and ostraciszing progressives for speaking out against oppression is EXACTLY what we're fighting against. What in the hell is the 'rhetoric' do you disagree with? Having empathy for lgbtq+ people? Jesus. If so, this is definitely not the place for you.