whoreticulture

joined 4 months ago

It's not really dodging a conversation when you enter it being critical of the rhetoric, and not the content. I don't think anyone is fooled but I think you are confused.

So the pro-Biden comments are staying up? Exactly like I said ? lmao

No reason for this to have been removed

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

? I entered the conversation pointing out a rude style of communication. You're just continuing it lol. Talking about communication is substantial.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

lmao get back to me when the mods on lemmy.world stop deleting every comment that is critical of Biden. STFU. There is no recourse for mods on Lemmy and they can use their powers to delete any comments they want. The only recourse you have is to find a fediverse that caters to your weakass centrist views.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I wasn't arguing with pugjesus, just in contention with their disingenuous communication. PugJesus did not disprove any claims I made. I think you're not following the conversation.

You don't have any evidence one way or the other that everyone understood the counter argument immediately, what he brought up was a relatively obscure historical event and if you disagree with that assertion, I can't even begin to take you seriously.

This is literally the first time you have said you use maps, so yes, you are a liar? Literally?

It's not a discussion because you're not bringing anything to the discussion lmao

Glad you agree, sucks you won't ever change

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you felt there was a contradiction, you could have named that contradiction. All you did was say that you thought the other person hasn't even read it. The tone was not, "oh if you have read Mussolini why do you think he says etc etc when the Doctrine of Fascism says etc etc " it was "I have read a lot and I don't think you have read the things you said you have read"

What you're doing is acting passive aggressively superior at every turn and not making or directly addressing any actual points 🥴 very liberal coded of you, not surprising

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Yes exactly. You didn't make any points, you just brought something up. You did explain your point way further down, but, that is only after being called out lmao

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

they said if you want to learn more about a topic that they described, that you can read Mussolini.

you responsed with a sarcastic "Cool" and said oh by the way have you actually even read Mussolini?

I can't be the first person to tell you how obnoxious you are lol. And I know you know what you're doing lol.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

It's not that you read, it's that you name drop books and knowledge instead of incorporating them into a discussion. And your self-defensive posture of "well SORRY for READING" is like the oldest trick in the manipulator's book.

It's not that you read, it's that you brag about reading in a way that doesn't contribute to the conversation. It's not that you responded, it's that you responded in a way that turned the suggestion into a pissing match of who has read what.

I'm telling you this, but I'm sure you know this because you probably do this all the time to give yourself an ego boost.

view more: next ›