wccrawford

joined 1 year ago
[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's awesome. I can't wait now.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, I'm not trying to make it happen. I just think it's inevitable that someone will. And probably pretty soon.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's an interesting idea. I'll have to see if I can do something of the sort and see if it matters. I have a feeling it'll still pop the stupid messages about connecting to the internet, but maybe I'll get lucky and it won't.

Thanks!

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

To add to this, my LG C2 kept popping up a message that I could use Alexa with it if I connected it to Wifi.

To kill that message, I did. Now it pops up advertisements in that same way from time to time.

If I take it offline again, I get messages about connecting it again.

It's effectively impossible to kill ads on it.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

A couple years ago I signed up for an email provider so I could use my own domain and avoid Google being able to kill my email account. They've got a spam filter, but it's ridiculously bad. I've been looking for better ways, but still haven't found them.

Ironically, I'm hoping a free locally-run LLM will soon be able to filter emails appropriately. I haven't seen anyone trying yet, but I'm sure they're out there.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Nobody should ever be banned without knowing exactly what they were banned for. Either he's lying (I doubt it) or they didn't bother telling him, just gave him a perma ban without notice.

That's pretty shitty. They deserve the shit storm this will kick up.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think, even without a source, that's it's pretty much a given that each generation of cards is going to be about the same price as the last, possibly adding in some more for inflation.

Also, the xx80s and xx90s were always for gamers with insane expectations. The xx60s and xx70s are much more reasonable and are still amazing. Anyone complaining about the prices of the top end cards should just re-evaluate what they need instead of grumbling about prices.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"we had an argument in a bar and I got up and left, then she sent the text,"

If you abandon your girl in a bar, you should absolutely expect to lose her, birthday or not. She is under no obligation at that point to consider his feelings about his special day.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh man. There's only one of those dungeons that I actually like, and I got almost 2/3 through it solo, and decided that I just didn't care enough. I'm sure I could have done it with enough tries... But ugh. So time consuming.

I totally respect people that do it even once, and people that do it for every dungeon are basically gods.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

When I was a kid, Tomb Raider was a pretty easy game, except this one part that required absolutely perfect timing for a some running and jumping between platforms for a bonus item.

At the start, I could make it to the next platform. After a while, I could do 2. Eventually, I got 3. After a long, long time, I finally managed to string all of them together... And screwed up the very last one.

Here's the thing, though. I got it on the very next attempt. I had learned that sequence so well that it actually wasn't hard any more, even though it was nearly impossible for me at the start.

Afterwards, my parents (who watched the whole thing) told me they had never seen me focus on something so intently for so long and they couldn't believe I managed it.

That's what souls games are, from start to finish. Every single encounter is basically impossible at first, until you die and learn enough to get through it. But you start from the beginning of the game every freaking time.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

They've been quietly preventing Firefox from becoming a threat for a long time. There are constant little things that just mysteriously don't work as well on Firefox, for no reason. People have changed the user agent and found that it works just like on Chrome with Chrome's agent. Youtube was doing it for a while, and reviews on the search are another instance. I was at the Dentist's and they were asking for a Google review, but I couldn't find the spot to leave it. I switched to Chrome and it was magically right where it was supposed to be.

So they already think Firefox could be a threat, and preventing ad-block is going to make it a bigger threat.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Companies won't hire someone that's overqualified because the employee is very, very likely to leave again soon. It costs the company a ton of money and headache for very little benefit.

 

On the bottom of my prints, there's an area of underextrusion and I can't figure out what's causing it.

I first noticed it when I switched back to a textured PEI bed while trying to print ASA. It's on 20x20mm squares, and it's on the test print for setting up pressure advance... But only on the left-most object.

It's the same even if I add 2 lines of skirt or not. (In addition to my KAMP Voron purge.)

It happens everywhere on the bed that I've tested. It happens to PLA, but it harder to see. For ASA, it's very obvious. For PLA, it's almost as smooth as the rest of the surface, but it's there if you know what you're looking for.

I've only been printing PLA for quite a while now, so I don't know when this started.

I've got an LDO Voron 2.4 with Tap, KAMP, Revo hot end. I've calibrated pressure advanced and changed the value, and I've tried different z offsets with the textured bed, which doesn't change it. (But does change how good the rest of the bottom surface looks.)

Anyone got any ideas?

https://imgur.com/a/ggaZDMY

view more: next ›