unmagical

joined 1 year ago
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's the worst that can happen? Someone buys it and starts hawking boner pills? Yeah, that ain't exactly gonna ruin his good name.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Eh, congrats! New Job?

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 55 points 2 days ago (11 children)

When was the last time you got a 63% raise?

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

At some point the electrical signal has to be clear at a hardware level. Companies can make it harder, but if they're streaming any info to a device in your possession someone will be able to extract that clean electrical signal and reproduce an acceptable feed.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What I mean by "on your computer" is not that it originates on your computer, but that some form of it exists there--namely this is going to be images, text, links, etc that the ad company hosts and a website will normally download temporarily along with the rest of the site's content. Once your computer has that site's information you can do anything you want with it. Importantly what exists on your computer is a local copy of what the ad servers host. If you decide to color ads blue on your computer that only affects your copy. The original ad, and everyone else's copies remain intact.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 days ago (10 children)

To put it another way:

  • If you want to see something it has to be clear (unencrypted)
  • If you want to see something on your computer it has to be on your computer
  • You can control your own computer

Therefore, any media that is viewed on your computer is clear, on your computer, in a realm that you control.

This is also why ad blockers work. You can send me ads, or requests to fetch ads and my computer just ignores them.

Companies will never be able to stop this, cause at some point you can always just intercept the data feed at a hardware level and reconstruct the stream.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 74 points 6 days ago

Realism wasn't necessarily the end goal of a lot of painting. When you look at old Christian art one thing to notice is that different people can have vastly different sizes. The virgin mother may be most prominent, some patron saint smaller, and the artist themselves or the commissioner may be included as smaller figures. This play of scale was a device to show what was important and being sure to capture and portray that hierarchy was a more important goal than realism.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 week ago

The author of a detective novel cannot prevent the reader from skipping to the end of the novel to find out who the killer is, even if that would spoil the pleasure of reading and ruin the author’s efforts to maintain suspense.

That's fucking gold.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1000005360

Probably just used the design labs. It is a previous generation controller though.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

This would be "again," no?

view more: next ›