tuna

joined 5 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 4 days ago

Looks to be in the works which makes me very happy. If you use nightly, make sure browser.tabs.groups.enabled in about:config is enabled

https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/native-tab-grouping-more-customizable-tab-bar/idc-p/72706/highlight/true#M39420

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

Very similar to mine. Although for me the ball was white and rolled right

I thought it was interesting I could only see the arm, probably because I wouldn't be able to picture the full body

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Something i didnt know for a long time (even though its mentioned in the book pretty sure) is that enum discriminants work like functions

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum Foo {
    Bar(i32),
}

let x: Vec<_> = [1, 2, 3]
    .into_iter()
    .map(Foo::Bar)
    .collect();
assert_eq!(
    x,
    vec![Foo::Bar(1), Foo::Bar(2), Foo::Bar(3)]
);

Not too crazy but its something that blew my mind when i first saw it

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

I want to take a look at this https://github.com/w-okada/voice-changer which is apparently a realtime ai voice changer. My friend wants to cosplay a character on his live stream and have the voice match with the visuals. Plan is to try the pre-trained models (to see if its any good) then try to train the model on as much audio we can get 💀 lol

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Arch is the only person who has been in my house for the last week and i have no clue how he is going about it and he has no clue how it is affecting him or how he feels and how it is affected me

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Mine also starts off the exact same way?? I'm pressing the middle option

Women are not allowed in this world anymore because of their own personal preferences or the way their body and body is designed and made and made and they have no choice to make decisions

but right here it takes a different path:

that make it a choice to do it and that makes them a bad person to do so they have no right of way of life or the choice that is not their right of way and that they are entitled and have to choose their choice to choose what to choose to choose to live with that choice is a right that is theirs and it's a choice and not yours

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i'm tricking the nintendo switch into thinking my computer is a bluetooth pro controller. I'm using a crate called bluer which exposes bindings to the BlueZ stack and it's been great to use.

I got to the point where it pairs the controller and hits B to exit. However it doesnt seem to accept any more button presses after that... :) So I have some ways to go.

I've also needed a project where I can challenge myself with the basics of async without it being overwhelming, and I think this hits the sweet spot. It's my first time using tokio spawn, join, and select in a real project!

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago

My reasons were more hardware related. When I was a bit younger my parents gave me a netbook which had 32 GB of storage, and Windows used almost all of it. I wanted to do creative projects in my free time, but I couldn't install programs or save any of my work. I would often restart to clear log files and gain a bit more working storage, which was extremely annoying because it took like 5 mins for the computer to finally settle down and be usable.

I eventually got a 32GB flash drive which helped a lot, but it was not enough. With 4GB ram I could only have about 3 browser tabs open, and not all the programs I wanted could be run off the flash drive. It was still resource management hell.

Somehow, some way, I learned about Linux. I got a 128GB microSD, put Mint on it. It truly set me free. I could install the software I wanted, I could make the things I wanted to make, I could open more programs at once, and I could do it all without unbearable lag. I never looked back since.

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

!0hn0@discuss.tchncs.de

If you'd like to learn how to speedrun a niche puzzle game, check this one out :)

I haven't written all the tutorial posts I've wanted to yet, so stay tuned.

There's some unexplored territory I haven't explained for myself, like the connection to graph theory (i dont have any foundational knowledge for graph theory so maybe someone smarter than me can help ;) i figure it would help formalize some proofs)

Feel free to share your progress!

 

In the post explaining the hint "one specific dot in all solutions imaginable" I cut the post short saying I had 2 strategies to help find the dots quicker. Well, it's because I realized my existing strategy might not be the most optimized. I've finally figured out how to combine both strategies into one.

Let's jump straight into the algorithm, using the same board as the previous post.

⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️9️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

Choose 3 of the shortest directions, and count upward. The 4th axis contains the "overflow"

  • 1 dot west
  • 2 dots north
  • 3 dots east

Here's how I count up in my head:

⚫️3️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️2️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
1️⃣#️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

Fill in the remaining dots blue

⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️#️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️7️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️8️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️9️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️9️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

Start from 0 and count how many dots away from the nearest wall, in the same direction. I'll call the number of dots between the last blue dot and the first wall the "blue gap." In this case, it is 1.

⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️9️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️1️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️

Go to the nearest wall in the other 3 directions, and apply the same blue gap. The rest of the dots in that direction are blue

⚫️1️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
1️⃣9️⃣🔵🔵1️⃣
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

Tada:

⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️9️⃣🔵🔵⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

I learned about the blue gap today. I might be able to get some new PBs with this strat!

 

This is my favorite strategy, because it always makes me feel amazing when I spot it!

I'm hoping to explain the blind dot rule by taking you along a similar journey I took to discover the blind dot rule. Enjoy :)

In a time before I came to fully understand what the blind dot rule was, I started to pick up on these areas that looked like little crevices (this is what we will call them for now). There was some sort of pattern going on, but I couldn't put my finger on what it was.

Here's a 5x5 board I got one day, full of these crevices:

⚫️2️⃣🔴⚫️🔴
⚫️⚫️4️⃣⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️🔴⚫️

Let's solve step-by-step, and listen to what these crevices (denoted by 🔳) tell us:

⚫️2️⃣🔴🔳🔴
⚫️⚫️4️⃣⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴🔳⚫️🔴🔳

🔵2️⃣🔴⚫️🔴
🔵⚫️4️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔵⚫️3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️🔴⚫️

🔵2️⃣🔴⚫️🔴
🔵🔵4️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️🔴⚫️

The 4️⃣ can see all its dots.

🔵2️⃣🔴⚫️🔴
🔵🔵4️⃣🔴⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️🔴🔴⚫️

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵4️⃣🔴⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴🔴🔴🔴⚫️

Alright, pause.

It seems that those 2 crevices became red! There was also a new crevice made in the process. Maybe those will turn red too?

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵4️⃣🔴🔳
🔵🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔳

Let's continue solving:

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵4️⃣🔴⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣🔵⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣🔵⚫️
🔴🔴🔴🔴⚫️

Both 3️⃣s can see all their dots.

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵4️⃣🔴⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣🔵🔴
3️⃣🔴3️⃣🔵🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴⚫️

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵4️⃣🔴🔴
🔵🔴3️⃣🔵🔴
3️⃣🔴3️⃣🔵🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴

If you paid especially close attention, you might've noticed that not only did all the crevices become red, every "entrance" to their cove became red too.

One explanation involves the property explained in a previous post, that a board has one, and only one solution.

Suppose we had a board like this instead:

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵⚫️🔴⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣🔵⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣🔵⚫️
🔴🔴🔴🔴⚫️

Let's assume that they are blues:

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵⚫️🔴⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣🔵🔵
3️⃣🔴3️⃣🔵🔵
🔴🔴🔴🔴⚫️

Then the crevices would be ambiguous, or allow the board to contain more than 1 solution:

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵🔴🔴❔
🔵🔴3️⃣🔵🔵
3️⃣🔴3️⃣🔵🔵
🔴🔴🔴🔴❔

So, if it can't be blue, then it must be red!

🔵2️⃣🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔵🔵🔴⚫️
🔵🔴3️⃣🔵🔴
3️⃣🔴3️⃣🔵🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴⚫️

Let's use our new understanding to find and solve other boards using this type of pattern.

...hey look!

5️⃣⚫️⚫️5️⃣⚫️
⚫️⚫️4️⃣⚫️3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️🔴⚫️
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

What about this one? Something seems special around here:

5️⃣⚫️⚫️5️⃣⚫️
⚫️⚫️4️⃣⚫️3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️3️⃣
⚫️🔳⚫️🔴⚫️
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

If you imagine each blue dot is like a 4-way laser, it would cover the entire board except for that spot!

5️⃣⚫️⚫️5️⃣⚫️
⬇️⚫️4️⃣⚫️3️⃣
⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️3️⃣
⬇️😎⬇️🔴⚫️
⬇️🔴🔴🔴🔴

In a way, it's kind of like the crevices. They also don't have any blue dots looking at them. See?

⚫️2️⃣🔴😎🔴
⚫️⚫️4️⃣➡️➡️
⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️⚫️
3️⃣🔴3️⃣➡️➡️
🔴😎⬇️🔴😎

Let's solve it and see what happens. Make a prediction!

Click to show solving steps5️⃣⚫️⚫️5️⃣⚫️
⚫️⚫️4️⃣🔵3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️🔴⚫️
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣⚫️⚫️5️⃣🔴
⚫️🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️🔴🔴
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣⚫️⚫️5️⃣🔴
⚫️🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
⚫️⚫️🔵🔵3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️🔴🔴
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣⚫️⚫️5️⃣🔴
⚫️🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
⚫️🔴🔵🔵3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️🔴🔴
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣🔵🔵5️⃣🔴
⚫️🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
⚫️🔴🔵🔵3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️🔴🔴
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣🔵🔵5️⃣🔴
🔵🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
🔵🔴🔵🔵3️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️🔴🔴
⚫️🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣🔵🔵5️⃣🔴
🔵🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
🔵🔴🔵🔵3️⃣
🔴⚫️⚫️🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣🔵🔵5️⃣🔴
🔵🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
🔵🔴🔵🔵3️⃣
🔴⚫️🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴

5️⃣🔵🔵5️⃣🔴
🔵🔴4️⃣🔵3️⃣
🔵🔴🔵🔵3️⃣
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴

Cool! The dot indeed ended up red! Not only that, but ALL 3 of its neighbors ended up red as well!

It seems like the pattern has less to do with crevices, and more to do with whether any numbered blue dot can see a given dot.

Let's call the dots that can't be seen blind dots. For the dots immediately adjacent to the blind dot, let's call them guard dots.

Let's go over one final example for this post. In the previous examples, we assumed the line of sight of numbered blue dots extends arbitrarily outward, but I want to show that there is technically a limit.

Let's demonstrate by example, using this board:

🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴1️⃣⚫️⚫️2️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️2️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️

Here are the areas I'm claiming to be blind dots:

🔴🔳⚫️⚫️1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴1️⃣⚫️⚫️2️⃣
🔳⚫️⚫️2️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️

You might think these can't be blind dots, because the numbered dots has line of sight to them:

🔴😧⬅️⬅️#️⃣
🔴🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
😧⬅️⬅️#️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

But they don't have line of sight, because the 1️⃣ in the top right can only see one dot to the west, and likewise, the 2️⃣ near the bottom can only see one more dot to the west before it would see all of its dots.

🔴😎❌🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
😎❌🔵2️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️

Of course, let's solve it to double check!

Solution steps🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️⚫️
🔴1️⃣⚫️⚫️2️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️2️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️

Looking further south would exceed the 1️⃣:
🔴⚫️🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️🔴
🔴1️⃣⚫️⚫️2️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️2️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️

One specific dot included in all solutions imaginable for the 2️⃣:
🔴⚫️🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️🔴
🔴1️⃣🔵⚫️2️⃣
⚫️⚫️⚫️2️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️

The 1️⃣ can see all its dots:
🔴⚫️🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️🔴
🔴1️⃣🔵🔴2️⃣
⚫️🔴⚫️2️⃣⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣⚫️

Only one direction left to look in for the 2️⃣:
🔴⚫️🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️🔴
🔴1️⃣🔵🔴2️⃣
⚫️🔴⚫️2️⃣🔵
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣🔵

The 2️⃣ near the bottom can see all its dots:
🔴⚫️🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣⚫️🔴
🔴1️⃣🔵🔴2️⃣
⚫️🔴🔴2️⃣🔵
🔴⚫️⚫️3️⃣🔵

Only one direction left to look in for the 2️⃣ and 3️⃣:
🔴⚫️🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣🔵🔴
🔴1️⃣🔵🔴2️⃣
⚫️🔴🔴2️⃣🔵
🔴⚫️🔵3️⃣🔵

The 3️⃣ can see all its dots: 🔴⚫️🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣🔵🔴
🔴1️⃣🔵🔴2️⃣
⚫️🔴🔴2️⃣🔵
🔴🔴🔵3️⃣🔵

Yep! Those are blind dots!

🔴🔴🔴🔵1️⃣
🔴🔴2️⃣🔵🔴
🔴1️⃣🔵🔴2️⃣
🔴🔴🔴2️⃣🔵
🔴🔴🔵3️⃣🔵

In summary, we learned two things:

  • A blind dot is a dot that cannot be reached or seen by a blue dot with a number
  • A blind dot and its 4 adjacent guard dots are to be filled in with red walls

The blind dot rule is helpful because it can place red dots in a way that constrains numbered blue dots, which makes it quicker to count.

In the next part, I'll explain the deal with the guard dots. It turns out, there is more to the blind dot rule than meets the eye ;)

See you in the next one!

 

When I first started out, this was a confusing hint. It is saying something specific, but at the same time it feels vague.

It's best to understand this hint with an example.

Let's suppose there exists a 5x7 board, with a 9️⃣ in this position:

⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️9️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

Let's try coming up with valid solutions using trial-and-error, and see if we can spot any patterns:

⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔵9️⃣🔵🔵🔵
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️

⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔴9️⃣🔵🔵🔵
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️

⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔵9️⃣🔵🔵🔴
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️

⚫️🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔵9️⃣🔵🔵🔵
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️

It seems like no matter how we draw it, we always have blue dots in these positions:

⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️9️⃣🔵🔵⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔵⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

That's what the hint means :)

There are 2 strategies I know of that can find where the blue dots are without having to exhaustively list all solutions. I'll have to share in future posts!

 
  • 4x4 — 2 seconds
  • 5x5 — 3 seconds
  • 6x6 — 7 seconds
  • 7x7 — 12 seconds
  • 8x8 — 20 seconds
  • 9x9 — 38 seconds

My 5x5 is pretty optimized, and the rest are decent. My 9x9 has some room for improvement though.

If you haven't played before and you'd like to play, you can do so here: https://0hn0.com

Just know that my first 9x9 took maybe 30+ minutes. It takes many, many boards to get competitive!

 

The fundamental rule is that board generation has one, and only one solution. It doesn't sound that insightful on the surface, but it is that assumption which led me to discover important advanced strategies, as well as spot other smaller, esoteric cases. This post covers one of those esoteric cases, but it illustrates the rule well.

Let me explain with an example, of a partially completed board:

🔵5️⃣4️⃣4️⃣🔵
⚫️🔵🔴🔴⚫️
⚫️🔴⚫️⚫️4️⃣
2️⃣2️⃣⚫️⚫️3️⃣
🔴⚫️⚫️5️⃣⚫️

Specifically, let's focus on the leftmost 2️⃣, and ignore the irrelevant parts:

🔵5️⃣🔵🔵🔵
⚫️🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
2️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

I am reasoning that it should be filled in like so:

🔵5️⃣🔵🔵🔵
🔴🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
🔵🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
2️⃣🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

How can I be so sure? Suppose immediately above the 2️⃣ lives a red wall. The dot above that could be either red or blue (denoted by ❔)

🔵5️⃣🔵🔵🔵
❔🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
🔴🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
2️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

In other words, the board would have two solutions, which breaks the rule that boards have a single solution.

So it must be a blue dot above the 2️⃣.

🔵5️⃣🔵🔵🔵
⚫️🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
🔵🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
2️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

From here, conventional rules can be applied. Looking further north would exceed the 2️⃣, so it must be a red wall.

🔵5️⃣🔵🔵🔵
🔴🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
🔵🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
2️⃣⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

And the 2️⃣ has only one direction left to look in.

🔵5️⃣🔵🔵🔵
🔴🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
🔵🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
2️⃣🔵🔴⚫️⚫️
🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️

Let's add back the other dots and solve it, to see if it works!

🔵5️⃣4️⃣4️⃣🔵
🔴🔵🔴🔴⚫️
🔵🔴⚫️⚫️4️⃣
2️⃣2️⃣🔴⚫️3️⃣
🔴⚫️⚫️5️⃣⚫️

(Filling in the 2️⃣ and 5️⃣)
🔵5️⃣4️⃣4️⃣🔵
🔴🔵🔴🔴⚫️
🔵🔴⚫️🔵4️⃣
2️⃣2️⃣🔴🔵3️⃣
🔴🔵🔵5️⃣🔵

(3️⃣ can see all dots)
🔵5️⃣4️⃣4️⃣🔵
🔴🔵🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔴⚫️🔵4️⃣
2️⃣2️⃣🔴🔵3️⃣
🔴🔵🔵5️⃣🔵

(Only one direction left for 4️⃣ to look in)
🔵5️⃣4️⃣4️⃣🔵
🔴🔵🔴🔴🔴
🔵🔴🔵🔵4️⃣
2️⃣2️⃣🔴🔵3️⃣
🔴🔵🔵5️⃣🔵

Yay! It seems like this idea might help complete more boards.

 

I recommend using emojis to share boards when demonstrating hypotheticals.

  • 🔴 = wall
  • 🔵 = blue dot
  • ⚫️ = empty
  • 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣9️⃣ = "numbered" blue dot with respective number
  • #️⃣ = unspecified, numbered blue dot

I also sometimes use ▪️ to represent areas where numbered dots can't see.

When writing a board, add 4 spaces after each line to make it appear more compact. Here, the .'s represent spaces

⚫️⚫️⚫️2️⃣⚫️....
⚫️1️⃣⚫️⚫️2️⃣....
4️⃣🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️....
⚫️🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️....
⚫️🔴4️⃣4️⃣⚫️

Result:

⚫️⚫️⚫️2️⃣⚫️
⚫️1️⃣⚫️⚫️2️⃣
4️⃣🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔴⚫️⚫️⚫️
⚫️🔴4️⃣4️⃣⚫️

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, thinking about it more, the similarities are kind of narrow.

You could make a better comparison with a regular crowd, but then it wouldn't feel like much of a showerthought at that point because it's just observing that the crowd has moved online.

Laugh tracks might be used to improve there ratings of a show, but with memes there's not really a show and no one's forcing a laugh

I think the essence of what I was thinking of though is that just like a regular crowd, an online crowd can still influence you to think something is funnier or better than you would alone (at least for me)

[–] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

LMAO, yeah this one didnt seem to hit did it

view more: next ›