I tend to think that once the media calls each state on election night, it becomes very difficult to move forward with contested results UNLESS it comes down to a single state again. If it's a toss up, they'll flex but if it takes flipping multiple states I think the Supreme Clowns will probably take the L.
thegr8goldfish
joined 7 months ago
Bro, I voted Nader in 2000. In Florida. I still love Nader but I sure learned that lesson.
Definitely underground. The temperature swings would be wild otherwise.
I'm probably biased but I always assumed the only reason they tried to railroad him was because his impression was so on the money.
New owner gets taxed based on what they pay for it, so they county will end up collecting more.
Some localities limit the increase in taxable value to a fixed percentage, which can combat that. The taxable value of my home is something like 25% of the actual value.
Now do the corporations.
If he flexs his newfound immunity he could definitely stir the pot.
Weird how those guys are all in the same party.
case violates centuries of New York case law.
No worries. The Supreme Clowns of the United States have already been clear that precedent means nothing.
That's for sure. Every one of those fuckers should have gone directly to jail that night. If that had been a George Floyd protest they would have just opened fire.
If they get a tax cut then every citizen should be entitled to one free download. Honestly they're lucky we don't put it in the public domain after pulling that bullshit.