lmao. Literally the only thing that had any truth or wit to it was plagiarised
swlabr
shakes fist at gerard that David is a real scallywag!
If we’re framing this as a breakup, david won the breakup.
Also, billing David Gerard as "the Forrest Gump of the internet" in a tweet and not mentioning that you can plausibly blame him for the whole Musk X Grimes collab is a true fumble
That's a lot of words about what is or isn't a reliable source from one who doesn't seem to know what a reliable source is. For a person of these beliefs, it is not surprising at all that their criteria seem to be:
- anything that agrees with them is reliable
- anything David Gerard considers unreliable is reliable because David Gerard is a big meanie and won't include citations to HBD articles, uwu
- anything that David Gerard or any friendly associate of David Gerard publishes is UNreliable, again because he is a meanie; see above, uwu
Dawg, maybe you need to step back from this all. As Voltaire once said, reality has a well-known liberal bias. Your beliefs are probably just counter to reality, and the corpus of data is not in your favour.
I wonder what initial conditions spawned this fractal of bad. This Mandel-rot. This Sier-stink-ski
Am I crazy to think that guy has musk’s face?
This happened a while ago and I still have mixed feelings about it: a band I like started a music label and named it p(doom): https://pdoomrecords.com/
Alternate pitch could be pyramid plugging. There’s an added slant here that pyramids don’t have flared bases.
I Was Fired From My Company But It Turned Out I Was Destined To Prevent The Robot Apocalypse With My Over 9000 IQ
Honestly that’s an edit distance of like 2 from too many trashy harem isekai
The guano-hole is dark, but full of bat-diamonds. Just presenting an excerpt of the reply chain, for the reader’s pleasure:
Reply A, “WhiningCoil”:
Reply B, “No_one”: