Ehhh... Your first word was "simply" and that was followed by a 4-paragraph paradigm so different from what we have it's bound to open many more cans of worms. I'm not sure it'll be that simple
spongebue
joined 1 year ago
My one question with this is, what do you do for multi-unit apartments and such that aren't condos? Yes, it's corporate-owned. Yes, that has its own slime that needs to be cleaned up. But it's also a reasonable way to increase housing density (meaning more housing and, if done correctly, less reliance on cars). Housing rentals do have their place in the world, especially when people only plan on living somewhere for a few years (college students, military, medium-term jobs)
How do you free up the housing market from landlords and investors while not screwing things up for people who would actually be better off renting?
Maybe, maybe not. If we're going to bring totally unrelated industries into the mix, Spirit and JetBlue airlines had their merger blocked. Airlines and grocery stores have a bigger public interest in not having monopolies than theme parks, which often have arguable monopolies in many places already if a major city only has one theme park.
More importantly, you said that they're already the same company. That is definitely not the case at this point.
"collectivizing" 😂
I'm not a fan of the company, but at least this one has a handful of different platforms underneath it - Oculus, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Facebook. Having Facebook the product and Facebook the overarching company kind of ads a little complication.
I don't quite feel the same way about Alphabet/Google, but at least that's more subtle.
X can fuck the duck right off.
I worked for SkyWest over 10 years ago as a ground worker. I can't even remember what they called their fake union (wouldn't have been SkyWest Inflight Association) but yeah. We also had some "you don't need a union, they're bad" propaganda as part of our training.
Honestly, it was a pretty fun job as a college student but some of that stuff made me feel a little dirty
Edit: memory remembered SAFA, and Google says that stands for SkyWest Airlines Frontline Association. In hindsight, yeah, pretty bad.
They're still working on it. A few states' attorneys general are suing to stop it while Krogway try to make some "totes not a monopoly" changes. Here in Colorado that means selling off some stores.
If I won't convince you otherwise there's not much point in discussing anything. I'll throw out one point I mentioned in another comment nonetheless...
From what I remember of this school district's case, the laptops were assigned the laptops for free to use at school. If they wanted to take the laptops home, they needed to pay an additional fee for extra insurance costs. This student did not. There is a reasonable argument that the school was tracking down its missing property. Maybe you won't be convinced otherwise, but a jury (really, a single jury member) very well could.
Getting warmer with that one, but Disney Springs is not a ticketed theme park. It's a shopping and restaurant thing, basically an outdoor Disney-themed mall.
It seems like it to you and me. At a trial, we'd hear their side of the story. Maybe there's some explanation that could make it somewhat reasonable, and you would have a hard time convincing a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
If I remember correctly, students had to pay extra to take their laptops home, I believe an insurance fee of some kind. The student whose family filed a lawsuit did not pay that. The laptop was supposed to be at school, but was not. In that case, there may have been reasonable doubt that the school was trying to track down its missing property that should not be outside of school grounds.
It's not intent to break the law, it's intent to do what you did. If I walk out of a store with a can of tuna I didn't pay for, that's shoplifting, right? Well, not necessarily.
If I walk into a store, pick it up off the shelf, hide it in my jacket, and dart for the exit, probably.
If my toddler slipped it into my jacket pocket, and I didn't notice, probably not.
If I put it in my jacket pocket because my toddler started to run away, I forgot about it, and paid for a cart of groceries... Maybe? But unlikely to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn't an accident.
Part of the problem comes when companies go out of their way to provide a service on their end that could be covered reasonably easily on the consumer's side of things. Why put a few cents worth of storage in a device and make it locally accessible when you can make it cloud-connected and hosted to turn it into a revenue stream?
Another example, GM has had OnStar for ages. It does the same things your cell phone does, so it's hard to justify the subscription. Plus Android Auto/Car Play works really well and relies on something you update more often. So naturally, GM revamped their infotainment to do the things you'd have your phone do and got rid of Android Auto/Car Play.