rowinxavier

In their image it looks like pin 5 is getting positive. I would expect it to work for a short time without a resistor then fail, but if you have a couple you could always sacrifice one with a test.

True, but how do we manage the harm done in the present. Sure, one day, maybe, we will get to socialism, but until then people suffer today. Should we not look pragmatically at the most effective thing to do now with a mind to future strategy? For example, in the short term better protections for workers does entrench capitalism by helping it limp on for a while longer, but people benefit from that now and restricting companies can create a cultural shift which reduces their ability to impact future elections, say when a vote for a particular socialist idea is being debated. Does that make sense?

All models are approximations of reality, thus they are ideas humans make in the context of their social situation. Norms and attitudes impact what we research, how we interpret data, and what we end up believing.

While the aim of science is to get closer to the truth the end result is going to approach but never reach perfect accuracy. With gender we see the social norms all through the expression of gender in different ages, generations, socioeconomic statuses, cultures, and countries. With sex we see a flattening of what is present into a strict binary with exceptions rather than what is actually present, a range of different karyotypes, sensitivities to hormones, levels of hormone production, interactions in regulatory genes, and differing morphologies. Gender is a diverse spectrum, but so is sex, and the reason we teach the XX XY version is the same as how we teach mathematic ideas. Basic stuff first, then expanding on that idea, then going further until we have the capacity to really understand the basics, like the multiple page proof that 1+1=2. Yes, basic biology says male and female, but intermediate talks about the diverse presentations of sex.

In the USA you have a stark choice to make. If you vote for the Republican party you will likely have a dictator and the end of democracy. If you vote for the Democratic party you will likely have more of the same last few years with some small progress on progressive causes.

But if you vote third party you don't get the third party. You don't get what the third party option is offering, you get one of the two main parties instead. What this means is you really do have yo vote both for something and against something else.

If you vote for the Republican you are voting against the Democrat.

If you vote for the Democrat you are voting against the Republican.

If you vote third party you are voting against both of the major parties.

If your candidate has a real chance of reaching the plurarily in the electoral college then yes, you can vote for your third party candidate, but if not then any vote you make third party is actually not going to have any impact at all, being as it will be against both major parties equally.

So really, voting third party at a national level is useless. In a local race the chance of a win is much higher, but at a national level it is worse than meaningless. The effect you could have by voting for the major party which most closely aligns with your views is lost if you vote for a third party who has no chance of winning.

Now moving for ranked choice voting or similar is something you can do locally, voting for local races to have more socialist candidates is something you can do, funding independent journalism is something you can do, and running for local office is something you can do. All of those things as well as many more will take your effort and make actual positive change. Voting third party in a national election at this point in time will not.

What cross are you talking about? Ankhs are the only thing that comes to mind and you buy those at the shops at the start of each 5 level set, so 6,11,16, etc. Ankhs provide a resurrection if you die but you won't have your gear or any potions etc, so you have to run back to the site at which you died where you will find a backpack with all your stuff.

If someone does not treat you with respect you are not their friend, you are their pet.

It is no reflection on you at all, this is purely on them, but if they don't respect you they are not treating you as an equal as they should be.

You deserve better.

A healthy relationship can include a difference of experience, knowledge, even power, but not respect. Respect is the bedrock of a good relationship and if you don't have that you may need to look elsewhere. If you were not modelled self respect or taught it you would benefit from learning about it.

That all said, she sounds like she may just be compensating in some way, putting you down to elevate herself, but seriously you don't have to take that. She could potentially change and stop this behaviour but she may persist and you may have no option but to get into a new friend ggroup and leave this one.

The question is not about what is possible, it is about what is common. Also, I am not saying the SAD is good or even better than vegan. Anyone trying to eat well is likely to make some of the same good choices, such as reducing refined sugars, dropping a portion of their ultra processed foods, and monitoring and meeting their protein needs. Being unable to hit your protein needs on a vegan diet is something an incautious person may experience, but supplementing protein or increasing protein components in your meals is manageable.

That all said, it takes extra work. Most people don't have the spare effort to cook at home for every meal, people are time and money poor and stressed beyond all reasonable limits, so we need to try to make some sort of plan that can actually be followed, not just some ideal. Is vegan possible? With effort and education it seems that some people can manage it, so at least some portion of people could do that. On the flip side if someone eats fish and chicken as their meat rather than beef have they not made progress from a bunch of ways? Definitely fewer carbon emissions. I don't claim to know the answer for what we should do but saying "do this perfect thing" seems counterproductive.

I used heavy trance when I had trouble when I was younger. I used night sounds like rain and thunder for a couple of years. Now my partner watches Minecraft videos while heading off to sleep and I cuddle them and fall asleep with them.

That said, other tools are exercise, less caffeine, Ritalin (so I am not overtired and stressed), less sugar, and better heat management.

If everyone has the same amount of starting capital it is a fair game assuming both can opt out at any time.

That said, the house appears to not be able to opt out (they definitely can, you just don't think about that part), and the house has more capital. For them each time someone plays a round there are only 3 possible outcomes. Half are the player loses, then a quarter are the player wins and plays another round, and lastly a quarter are the player wins and ends the game. The only case where the player wins is option 3, in all other cases, so 75%, the house wins because the next round has another chance to make the player lose directly at a 50/50 chance or play another round.

I'm reminded of an article talking about an outage at Yahoo! back when they were huge. It turned out the whole outage came down to one person messing up. The manager was asked how they let the person go and they said "Whatever the cost of that outage we just spent it on training, that person will never make that mistake again, nor will they allow someone else to make it".

If you have mods trying to manage things and they make a mistake you don't axe them, you discuss the situation and work in good policy for going forward. This one case is costly to the community, but nowhere near as costly as losing someone with this experience.

As for the vegan diet for cats issue, in general people who do vegan diets for kids and animals run a high risk of causing harm. Is it possible to do correctly? Maybe. Is it likely that an individual who is not trained in that field will manage it? No. But should it be investigated? Sure, but o my with experiments that actually do teach us something, no wasted studies of 3 weeks on a diet and checking blood tests, or comparing vegan kibble to omnivore kibble. Still, the same issues plague human dietetics and we don't have the answers there either, so yeah, maybe we should all chill a little and work together rather than identifying with one side of the argument and vilifying the other.

I've made it through the final boss and returned to the surface with the amulet as a huntress and mage but never a rogue. That said, yes, it is hard, and yes, it takes a lot of attempts. I would recommend trying to find ways of diverting enemies, tanking a little damage, and making yourself invisible. You can get closer to the boss using blink, haste, and invisibility and you can make the other enemies hit him with stones of aggression. You may also want to consider scrolls of challenge, wand of lightning or corrosion, and using the cloak to go invisible for a turn to let enemies dispirse. That said, good job getting that far, try again with what you learned, you will get there.

I'm here in Australia and now, 4.5 years in, still haven't had it. I mask whenever outside and use good hand hygiene at a times. I carry alcohol hand sanitiser and have wipes in the car for when I take my mask off in the car to wipe my face. I haven't had a cold, flu, RSV, or covid since 2019 when I started wearing the mask because of bushfires. I work with vulnerable people who could get very sick from covid and so I don't want to carry it person to person, and I also have an immune compromised partner who I don't want to give it to. Honestly it is not a big ask and it is very effective to just mask up.