piecat

joined 1 year ago
[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I think most of the german scientists the USA took were in fields like rocketry and physics.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

A dab of super glue in the screw hole, find a screw driver you don't really care about, add a drop of superglue accelerator

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It isn't that AI will have replaced us in 24 months, it's that we will be enslaved in 24 months. Or in the matrix. Etc.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

My absolute favorite is when I asked copilot to code a UI button and it just pasted "// the UI element should do (...) but instead it is doing (...)" a dozen times.

Like, clearly someone on stackoverflow asked for help, got used for training data, and confused copilot

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's the fact they vouched for the resturaunt.

I don't mean having a sign or directory. I mean saying specifically "the BR at our rest stop is allergy friendly" vs "our rest stop has a basken robbins, check their page for details"

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don't know any other landlords that advertise and vouch their clients on their website.

I bet cafeterias or food courts have gotten sued for the same thing.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't get what it has to do with copyright?

It's as simple as they built the equipment to require an app. And it needs the cloud, so its either accept the license or stop using the hw.

It's happening everywhere.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Judges have immunity when acting in their official duties.

If court were in session, that could be a real possibility. But it wasn't, the girl was there for a fieldtrip.

Kinda like police immunity. They can shoot you and your dog, but if they aren't on duty, they don't have that qualified immunity.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't see your point.

Building fossil fuel power infrastructure does nothing to move the needle, but building renewables does.

What are you actually proposing? Because it reads as "we shouldn't try because any benefits or impacts are long-term"

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

But the fun thing is that once we reach a critical point, it will go from having a positive carbon impact to a negative carbon impact. But we can never get there if we never start

It's all about scale and infrastructure.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

The overlap between "chemtrails" and "fluoride in the water" and "epa bad" is pretty high. It's actually kinda odd.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fair enough, there's potential for landfills to leak.

But if its between that, dumping it in the ocean, or exporting it, the landfill wins.

view more: ‹ prev next ›