person420

joined 6 months ago
[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This isn't a case of a streamer talking to a viewer through chat. This is a case of an adult private messaging with a minor in a self admittedly "inappropriate" manner. Doc might have said after the fact that he didn't "intend" on following through with his messages, but when an adult, even jokingly, is making plans to meet up with a fan at a convention who is a minor, that's a BIG red flag.

Twitch had no choice but to ban him. What if they did nothing and he did end up meeting up with them? What if it turned into SA allegations and it was found out that Twitch was aware of this? I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my kids talking to an adult over private messages full stop. Let alone if the content was "inappropriate".

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If you're a 40 y/o texting "inappropriate" things to a minor, you should have your twitch contract cancelled too.

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 months ago

Cats purrcking

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mets aren't good enough? ::cries in Yankees:::

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks! This was something that drives me crazy, but it seems like the biggest offenders are repost bots (which I don't have any problem with in general) and I suspect they are going to miss this post.

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The tl;dr of that article isn't even "no". It provides both sides of the accounts and references academics that argue both ways.

I read it to make the same argument you did, but ended up considering it a surprisingly well written article.

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 months ago

Dancesafe.org was it! I'm going back over 20 years to the late 90's early 2000's. I can't comment on the state of ecstasy today, I haven't rolled in over 20 years.

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Worse than that, that one website dance something that would test pills found that a huge percentage of the "ecstasy" people took didn't contain MDMA. A surprising amount didn't even contain illegal drugs. Just over the counter speed.

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Love it or hate it, they aren't intentionally designed not to be walkable, they're intentionally designed to discourage traffic from driving through them.

The reason communities like yours and the one behind your house aren't connected is to reduce the amount of cars driving down your block. To make it safer for your kids to play outside.