this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
80 points (92.6% liked)

RetroGaming

19110 readers
548 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

AKSHULLY that wasn’t a thing in the 2000s, just marketing hype. Rolls back then had between 70 and 120mg of MDMA, and 120 is a basal amount you want to take if you fully want to get rolling.

Now it’s TOTALLY a thing, tons of rolls have 300-400mg in a single pill now. It’s insanity.

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Worse than that, that one website dance something that would test pills found that a huge percentage of the "ecstasy" people took didn't contain MDMA. A surprising amount didn't even contain illegal drugs. Just over the counter speed.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Curious. When I last looked (quite a while ago) most of the tested pills were MDMA, with many containing caffeine as well. I guess it varies a lot over time.

https://dancesafe.org/

https://www.drugsdata.org/

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 months ago

Dancesafe.org was it! I'm going back over 20 years to the late 90's early 2000's. I can't comment on the state of ecstasy today, I haven't rolled in over 20 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)