morphballganon

joined 1 year ago
[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 2 days ago

Forbidden ice cream sandwich

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Strange card to be in Duskmourn

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Uh, what game character dresses like that?

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 5 points 1 week ago

Curses aren't Innistrad-specific. Amonkhet has some very flavorful ones.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 week ago

Guy's cloak makes his torso look disproportionaly large compared to his legs... but I guess he's a tall, thin, old guy who wears a big cloak

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The '80s called, they want their tour guide back.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 week ago

Resolution is kind of low, kind of hard to read, I think the bottom Swamp and Mountain are by Nestor something? Those are gorgeous

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The art in this set is killer

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Alone, the downside of sorcery speed is significant, compared to Grapple with the Past. Discarding Altanak for a land could be worthwhile though.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 week ago

I figured the former, but I am a poly person who knows poly ren faire people.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I was wondering what rating such a creature would get from the Council of Colors.

 

I love this kind of community in theory, because I love learning about how things work, but I don't love the posts asking for creature identification. Those are less how things work and more "I need an expert on this geologic region's fauna" so they seem like completely different topics to me.

I don't want to see spiders in my feed, but I'm happy to see curious objects. If I block the community due to the spiders, I miss out on the curious objects.

 

Just started today. Possibly related to the recent updates.

Swiping to back out still works, at least for images

v1.0.190

 

After editing a comment, UI fails to load the next page. Haven't tested if it's only in non-native instances.

Anyway, if I want to review an edit, I have to hit back twice, refresh, then scroll to find my comment again.

 

Looking at the blown-up thumbnails while waiting for the full-size images to load is pretty uncomfortable for my eyes... they search for detail that isn't there yet, and get strained. If there was an option to just see a spinning wheel or similar, I'd choose it in a heartbeat. Alternatively, displaying the image line by line as it loads (slow scan from top to bottom) would be even better, as it would allow me back out before loading the whole thing.

 

I just upgraded from a Galaxy J7 to a Pixel 3, which seems to have fixed the following problems:

  • Clicking on my profile shows me someone else's profile

  • Refreshing immediately after changing profiles results in no block list being applied

So, it seems those issues were specific to older hardware.

I am still seeing the issue where trying to save redgifs videos in-app only saves a stub file instead. Though, seeing as redgifs made their videos unsaveable in browsers, maybe this is due to deliberate site shenanigans. Voyager seemingly also can't do this. Though, Voyager doesn't download anything at all, as opposed to Connect's stub files. If the resulting file is non-functional, I think saving nothing would be better, ideally with an error message saying the file could not be saved.

 

I mentioned this in a comment but I figured it would get lost there.

The recent update means redgifs videos now load (yay) but reveals a new problem: videos cannot be saved in-app. Attempting to do so (with file permissions enabled) instead saves a tiny file with the same name, but none of the data.

As redgifs disallows saving from their site in-browser, this effectively makes redgifs content unsaveable.

Any solution or workaround would be appreciated.

 

Hello everyone. I recently learned there are a handful of people in my community who engage in non-barriered intercourse by default (sex with multiple partners without condoms).

I try to keep to only one non-barriered partner, to minimize any STI spread that may occur. Though testing is important, there are risks that 1. A test may be wrong, and 2. An infection can be introduced and spread after a successful clean test.

Also, my partner has a history of getting BV if her non-barriered partner(s) have other non-barriered partners. So, we keep it to only one non-barriered partner (for intercourse).

Any thoughts on this? Is it ethical to have more than one? Is it sustainable to only have one?

view more: next ›