lordkekz

You're right. It's still stupid though.

Companies should be at least as concerned with privacy and autonomy as individuals. Running everything on Microsoft Clouds, with Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office makes you massively vulnerable to the whims of Microsoft. And many of the potential customers are actually Microsoft's competitors on some level.

Thin clients may be a good model for some businesses, but this device particularly seems to be tailored to use only Microsoft's Azure cloud as opposed to self-hosting. Moving the computation to Microsoft's cloud doesn't make it inherently safer.

Sure, let's just move your personal desktop to someone else's computer where you don't even own the data. What could possibly go wrong?

It's actually pretty sad people have to defend themselves. In other countries you are guaranteed a lawyer even if you can't afford one.

Yeah, except the conservative Friedrich Merz really doesn't want that...

Actually, I think it should be possible to protect the fediverse: Each instance must simply not qualify as a social network. For example, the EU has many regulations which only apply for commercial providers with some minimum revenue or user count. As I understand it, none of these actually apply to small self-hosted servers (e.g. a by a local hackerspace or small friend group) even if they allow for federation.

To make this really viable, the Fediverse apps need to become better at discovery among many small instances. Currently, my self-hosted instance barely shows me any posts because it only gets updates for the communities I (or a user of my instance) explicitly subscribed to. This splits up the already small userbase so much that I instead use tchncs.de, one of the larger instances in Germany, where many communities are already subscribed by other users.

I can't believe any democrat who still works with MAGA even as they are literally dismantling the constitution and disobeying court orders is acting in good faith.

I can't imagine Sen. Durbin is actually this foolish; you don't become Senator without some modicum of political instinct.

Besides, the entire idea of "negotiating with big tech" (even through legislative hostage situations) is absurd. YOU CAN JUST MAKE THE LAW! Companies shouldn't have any say in that process whatsoever.

Truly one of the inventions of our time!

It alienated me.

Most queer people identify with the label “weird”.

That's fair actually. When I first heard it without context, I also felt kind of alienated by it.

I think you can be weird in good and bad ways, context matters in this case. I think it's fair to call out fascists for being "weird" in the sense that they are evil, crooked and - crucially - not relatable for the vast majority of voters. The "weird" thing is about the fascists not being "like us" - and thus very instinctively not trustworthy.

At the same time it's also possible to be "weird" in an individualistic, relatable and validating way. Most people have insecurities or fears on some level and accepting this "weirdness" can be validating and actually show likeness. I think it's very clear that Tim Walz didn't mean it like this.

He didn't call them weird out of the blue, but rather to sum up his other points about their unrelatable, evil behaviors. The message was something like: "The fascists are not real, believable people. They don't seem driven by everyday worries like us. They don't seem to have the same kind of feelings like us."

And I think that is actually exactly the message that wins elections in this political climate. Debating the issues is getting you nowhere if your opponent has no actual beliefs to debate against. Calling them out for being fake people with no actual beliefs is a better strategy.

I don't think Bernie will run again in 2028, but he is still relevant right now because nobody else is taking the lead. I hope people like Walz will step up and try to turn the DNC around. It'll be an uphill battle even with the DNC, not to speak of the actual election.

Turns out holding back the things that work (like calling fascists "weird") while not breaking with some of Biden's unpopular policies was a terrible idea... who would've thought? At least Walz is honest enough to admit it. I doubt the DNC will let the social democrats like Walz or Bernie take the lead though... establishment dems would rather stand by and praise Reagan while Trump dismantles the constitution.

I marked all unread emails as read without reading them... FOR THE GLORY OF THE EMPIRE!

I also have these concerns. It's really hard for consumers to tell where products come from and who actuslly makes them. We need a lot more supply chain transparency.

I think there's an EU law requiring some larger companies to explain their suppliers to prevent things like forced labor even outside the EU. But I think it doesn't nearly go far enough while also not providing an efficient digital path to verify supply chains, thus causing bureaucratic overhead and disadvantaging smaller businesses.