kryptonianCodeMonkey

joined 1 year ago

Can we stop platforming small insignificant bigots just because they say stupid and awful shit and happen to be somehow tangentially related to Trump or the GOP? This is how these psychos get the notoriety that earns them seats in congress where their bigotry actually matters, ala MTG, Boebert, Gaetz, etc. I had never heard of this lady yesterday, and now I'm seeing multiple national news stories about her aggressive bigotry and indecency. Not only was I happier yesterday, but she was also less electable yesterday because this shit, incredibly, unfortunately, sells on the Right. Fucking stop. Just stop it.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

But what kind of donut?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
  • She definitely needled him. I knew when she talked about all of the inane nonsense he talks about at his rallies and how he exhausts his own supporters so much they leave early during his 90 minute long ramblings that that would piss him off to no end, and sure enough all he could do after that was brag about his rallies and claim no one goes to her rallies. That being said, why in God's name did ABC let him get the last word on. Every. Single. Talking point? No matter who was talking first, no matter the subject, no matter how off course he was taking the topic, he'd start whining after she finished talking and they'd turn his mic back on and give him more time. If I'm not mistaken they gave him an extra rebuttal one time then tried to restrict Kamala from responding back until she insisted so much that they relented and then they STILL gave Trump another minute to give the last word again! What the hell was that? Tell the fat orange fuck "no", follow the rules and move on! If he wants to whine about her words, he can eat up time from the next question doing that. Don't give him more of platform to spout lies unchallenged. He has plenty of that already.

I like to think the reason the robbed guy didn't shoot the robber initially was because the robber was less armed than him and it wouldn't have been fair. When he stole his first gun, he must've thought "ohhhh, big mistake".

I understood that reference.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Would be funnier if only scalpers bought it and couldn't unload them.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"barely coherent" is being generous. "Rarely coherent" or "almost never coherent" are more accurate.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, it's at least worth the value of the stones and the raw materials of the band if it's recoverable without it all being red. But that is some "Holy Autism, Batman," levels of understanding what women, or any halfway average person would want.

view more: next ›