And speaking of completely flawed, your link doesn't work.
Anyway, thanks for ~~berating~~ informing me about AppImage but it's the closest thing on Linux to app bundles which IM<HO is the sanest way to package applications.
And speaking of completely flawed, your link doesn't work.
Anyway, thanks for ~~berating~~ informing me about AppImage but it's the closest thing on Linux to app bundles which IM<HO is the sanest way to package applications.
My totally unscientific opinion (with a double-your-money-back guarantee!):
I'm not crazy about either Flatpak or Snap for that matter as there's so much backend baggage for both as well as certain hurdles regarding privileges and access to the file system (somebody please correct me if I'm wrong or working with dated information.)
My other completely prejudiced, unfounded bias against Flatpak is that it appears to have been adopted by RedHat as "the one true way," and what with IBM's/RedHat's behaviour anti-FOSS behaviour lately, plus I've almost always have been an apt
user, I find it a pill hard to swallow.
Me, say what you will about the security issues and its other flaws, but I like AppImage.
Also I know this is my 3rd upload in the past couple of days, but I’m trying to help get this community going!
Who's complaining? 😆
Hmmm...my link in the previous post works. More proof of why Linux has never really taken off with the non-spectrum general public. I guess just following format (
[words](https://your.lousy.link)
) or -- god forbid -- you select a word, click the link button and paste just isn't esoteric enough...?In any case, I see that you edited your post to ~~cover your tracks~~ fix Lemmy's error.