emptiestplace

No, you don't need to do that.

It might be 'state after G3'

just look at how often sites tell you that you "forgot" your password, despite knowing you haven't

wtf are you talking about?

This is the worst second-hand embarrassment I've experienced in quite a while. I can't imagine working with someone like this.

I'm sorry my words upset you; 'bullshit' was meant broadly, referencing my general experience with watches in the 80s—like a synecdoche, where a part stands for the whole. It wasn’t aimed at anyone personally.

hey friend, you ok?

I don't love talking to my electronics, but when it works, "siri two minutes" is dramatically more convenient than whatever bullshit you'd do with tiny buttons on a Casio whatever in the 80s. I do agree with the sentiment, but ... we're pretty spoiled.

Holy XY.

Why are you doing this? What are you trying to achieve?

6201RS

• 6 - type code: single-row, deep groove ball bearing
• 2 - series / robustness: (2 corresponds with 'light', which is more durable than 0, but less durable than 3 or 4)
• 01 - size code: 12mm bore (inner diameter)
• RS - grease seal: rubber seal one side (no seal would be '6201', both sides sealed would be '6201-2RS'. Z and ZZ are used similarly to indicate presence of steel shield(s))

The 6201 is a good fit for this application, and providing the gerbil wasn't too hard on it, should last a long time.

What if they want to be killed?

It isn't an opinion, though, you are simply failing to follow the conversation. I said "the method itself", which implies that I am comparing this method to other methods and NOT discussing whether or not capital punishment is ok.

Do you struggle with context, hypotheticals, or both?