bigkahuna1986

joined 1 year ago
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Creo que puedes cambiar eso en la configuración de idioma.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That food looks way too edible to be Denny's

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Side note, for me, steamed kale is doing wonders.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My parents live in the country. They have one neighbor. He's on meth so he likes to start chainsawing right around dark and continues until around 2am.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

flash the bike with an aftermarket software.

Not a phrase I'd ever thought I'd hear.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Hey man those 3 people are almost millionaires. As soon as their crypto drops they'll be in the same boat as the Starbucks CEO!

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You pirate to preserve media.

I pirate because I like pissing off billion dollar conglomerates.

We are not the same.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 82 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This ‘secrecy’ is not an oversight but a feature that’s codified in the agreement between rightsholders and Internet providers.

Well this setup seems perfectly secure and not at all susceptible to malicious actors.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Basic tacos only! Not premium tacos!

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Not sure what I was expecting there.

 

Interestingly the release notes include this section:

fusee no longer supports applying IPS patches to KIPs.

Followed up by:

The IPS subsystem was originally designed to make nogc patches work for FS, but these are now internal, and it appears the literal only kip patches that exist are for piracy.

Does this indicate Atmosphere is going to become more hostile for any form of piracy?

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml to c/sysadmin@lemmy.ml
 

Not sure if this is the right place.

The last few days I've been experiencing a few issues resolving DNS on my home network. Strangely, rebooting the router seemed to fix it for a time. After running into the issue again I decided to investigate further. I'm using a Mikrotik router with my PC wired in with ethernet cable. The router is using DoH to Quad9 (https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query as per their documentation). I've also imported root certificates for validation.

As of right now, my desktop cannot resolve dns against 9.9.9.9, however it can resolve dns against 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8.

$ dig @9.9.9.9 reddit.com

;; communications error to 9.9.9.9#53: timed out

Interestingly also cannot curl the DoH URL (also a timeout). I thought maybe Quad9 is having issues so I jumped over to my EC2 instance, and I can dig/curl just fine.

I also turned on debug logging on the router, the logs indicate the same issue my desktop is having (timeout errors, sometimes and SSL handshake error).

My question to you all is, have I missed something in my testing/setup, or is Comcast blocking Quad9?

Additional info:

The mikrotik is the latest firmware (6.49.10). I can switch to CloudFlare DoH on the router and it works fine. I can remove the DoH setting entirely and it works. I've got 8.8.8.8 as a static DNS server and the 2 comcast dns servers are dynamic (75.75.75.75 and 75.75.76.76). NTP is setup and the router has the correct date/time/timezone.

As of this writing rebooting the router is no longer temporarily fixing the problem.

Edit:

Thanks u/melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone !

Per their post the status page shows issues in my area: https://uptime.quad9.net/

view more: next ›