balder1991

joined 1 year ago
[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Lemmy is naturally more focused on technology, so sports communities will probably continue to be mostly on Reddit.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It seems so, some people in the thread complained their parents don’t use ChromeCast because it needed the phone to use. Apparently seniors are also better if you want to sell an expensive subscription when the opportunity arises.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Google wants to force Gemini on my Pixel. So I nuked Android.

And what do you use now?

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

We are fine. The next generations are doomed with the tech we created.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the actual problem here is that if the product people can’t learn such a simple thing by themselves, they also won’t be able to correctly prompt the LLM to their use case.

They said, I do think LLMs can boost productivity a lot. I’m learning a new framework and since there’s so much details to learn about it, it’s fast to ask ChatGPT what’s the proper way to do X on this framework etc. Although that only works because I already studied the foundation concepts of that framework first.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The problem is experts in AI are biased towards AI (it pays their salaries).

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Country: it’s illegal to have software development skills 🤡

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (14 children)

As if people are forced to publish there.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TIL, I did some research because of your comment and indeed, the difference in their use cases is mostly a market thing, not so much a limitation of each one. This answer is particularly good at explaining that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›