I've noticed the same thing, but inconsistently - the link will often load after the second or third try. Can you confirm?
That’s why they needed to get the Protostar to the right place, to protect the present.
Right, but they've engineered a "present" in which Gwyn shouldn't exist, which is exactly what they spent the bulk of the season trying to avoid, down to her having to wear the armband to stabilize her.
IDK, at best I think it's way messier than he should be.
”Borg is short for cyborg!” While perhaps Dal is correct metatextually, that’s never been previously stated in Trek. In the Borg’s first appearance, “Q Who”, Guinan simply states, ”They’re called the Borg.” The Borg refer to themselves as such, there would be little reason for them to have named themselves after a term that originated in 1960s Earth science fiction.
There's a distinct possibility that it's Swedish.
Unfortunately, this has bugged me more the more I've thought about it. I think it undercuts the urgency of the entire season, which repeatedly emphasized how important it was to send the Protostar through the wormhole and making things exactly the way they were in season one.
Except it's apparently fine for Solum to never have its disastrous civil war, and never train soldiers to go back in time, even though that was absolutely critical to the story.
It seems like an effort to have their cake and eat it, too. Even if you can make it work logically, I don't think it works thematically.
It's hard to characterize mergers of this type as good news, but if Skydance is actually going to be "creative-first", it might be the least-bad of the potential outcomes that have been in play over the last year or so.
Hey look, a colossal waste of money that will accomplish nothing!
The interview goes into how Voyager-heavy this series is, so I suspect it was very deliberate.
That's actually from season one...I don't remember them getting into it too much, but
Season 1 spoilers
It seems Starfleet liked the quantum slipstream drive enough that they built their own version of the Dauntless from Voyager's records as a testbed. There are some subtle differences in the design.
To be honest, I have no idea how they even calculate what "makes money" in the streaming era. With ad-supported TV, I can see how you could calculate the relative value of each viewer, but for a streamer? I'm baffled as to how you would even do that math.
If Paramount had better infrastructure for a tween audience, and/or if the original plan to air it on Nickelodeon had come to fruition, maybe things would be different.
Ben Sisko, eat your heart out!
Good to know - frustrating, but hopefully we'll get it sorted out.