ValueSubtracted

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF

No idea - these things are often cast under code names, at least when it comes to TV and film, so it could be really hard to determine.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 47 minutes ago

I'd say this is set up to be Kinew's first big policy failure, but I'm not sure whether it will stick.

The fact that opposition to the plan is fuelled by conspiracy nutjobs suggests that the Tories won't do much to oppose Kinew's decision, despite the fact that the plan was put together under the Pallister government.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not enough knives.

I wonder if it will amount to a whole lot of nothing, with the municipalities that "opted out" complying with 99% of what's covered by the agreement anyway.

Yeah, the "audio adventures" description threw me a bit.

The Susan Twist narration for one of them is fun, though.

Yeah, I think Tilly and Vance can serve to "pass the torch" just fine, though I'm excited at the possibility that the other characters could pop up at any time.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

And how would that be nostalgia-free?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Believe me, I am extremely aware.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Ironically, The Daily Show has moved to Paramount+ along with the rest of Trek (also ironically, with the exception of Prodigy).

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website -2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

So what you want is Star Trek that...had nothing to do with Star Trek, because literally anything using the title, concept, or characters will be, by definition, "built on nostalgia." Got it.

For sure - I'm certain the supplements will be useful even with the 2E rules.

view more: next ›