TacticalCheddar

joined 1 month ago
[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For you why did fascism emerge in the first place

That's a broad question that has different answers depending on the time and place. There's no single answer to this.

why did it re-emerge nowadays.

Again, it's a broad question with different answers. However, I can definetly say that social media and selection bias play a role in pushing the average person to extreme views such as yours. Which is why I'd like to remind people to take a break and cool down every once in a while.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

You think that people who actually want to learn new things are the fascists?

He didn't say that. He just gave an example (a rather poor one given the context) of people lacking solidarity.

I'd ask you if you are dumb but you already answered that with your class skipping

Insulting people like this won't get you anything.

Not everybody sees teachers like evil oppressors jfc

Again, he never said this. Forgive me for saying this, but it seems you're very angry about something and you just want to start an argument. Maybe take a break from the internet for a day?

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I would like to add that we should also kick out capitalism and representative democracy out of the way because fascism is a byproduct of both of them.

Jesus, it seems that nowadays wherever I go I find either reactionaries or radicals pushing their insane takes no matter the relevance. I wish moderates would comment more.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, you think Putin has credibility when speaking on climate change?

I never said that. I said that to the general public he may appear as more credible based on his behavior when adressing the issue compared to Greta which would undermine environmental efforts. This is what I'm concerned about.

I can't imagine a world where you're calling that "petulant". At 16 years old she had more poise and gravitas than many of the world leaders she was speaking to. You say she hasn't done anything. I beg to differ. Further, if what she has done is nothing, it raises the obvious question: what have you done to avert climate catastrophe?

Ok, usually I welcome debates, but I can see that you were very angry when you wrote this so I think it's better that we stop here. Before finishing off, I would like to clarify one more time that I'm not a climate change denier. I just don't like the way Greta and others like her operate since it's my belief that their aggressiveness undermines the movement and increases the risk of turning people into reactionaries. That's my opinion. I'm entitled to it just as much as you're entitled to your own.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Here's a useful chart comparing all the popular cloud and email providers - https://eylenburg.github.io/cloud_comparison.htm

I use Tuta and I'm very satisfied with it. It offers end-to-end encryption, the client is open source and it's user friendly. The most common complaint you'll hear from people about it is that it doesn't offer IMAP. Personally I don't mind it that much. It really depends on what you're looking for.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it's tough work to get people to change. So far I managed to convince my family and a buddy of mine to get Signal and they only did it so they can communicate with me after I told them I won't be using Whatsapp. The vast majority of people told me it's too much of a bother to switch. They know where to find me anyway.

I gave up on the ideea of convincing people to ditch Facebook, Instagram and Tiktok. It's a lost cause.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Greta Thunberg is 22 years old right now, and was "screaming" and "blaming people" when she was 11 years old.

Expecting an 11 year old to provide answers that none of the established world has is silly.

Fully agreed.

She saw the world she was going to inherit and forced conversation to work toward solutions

I disagree. I saw her speak and the reactions to some of her speeches. Her inflamatory and derogatory speeches did nothing more than help opponents of the energy transition. To give you an example, when asked about it during an interview Putin jumped at the opportunity to discredit the energy transition. While the public saw Greta behaving like a petulant child during the speech, they then saw Putin speaking calmy, asking real questions like "How are poor nations going to transition when they need cheap fossils to sustain themselves?". They then take this bit and plaster it on every social media site. People see it and are inclined to take Putin's side since he appears more knowledgeable and in control of himself. And just like that he gets a boost in his reputation.

This is why I don't like activists like her and the author of this article. They do more harm than good by expressing themselves in such a violent manner.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"listen to the experts who have been screaming at you for 50 years."

That would be fine provided that it's done correctly and civilized. Which is my point. Raising awarness is fine.Throwing insults loudly left and right to raise awareness is not. It only makes you seem delusional and sheds a bad light on your cause. This allows climate change deniers to take advantage of that to further their agenda.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

We fully transition to clean energy like nuclear and build more power plants to allow us to store our online stuff.

The author of this article is not a serious person. He's in the same bucket as Greta Thunberg. They just like to scream and blame people instead of providing practical solutions. It's frankly tiring to hear them despite their honorable intentions.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

If you live in the EU, you will soon be able to message via a third party app to Whatsapp users thanks to the Digital Markets Act from last year. Meta said they're planning to release this feature this year. However through this feature Meta will still be able to retain data about your messaging. And since Zuckerberg has now openly aligned himself with Trump, there's a fair chance that data will be used against you at some point in the future.

I recommend you sever any ties to Meta and switch to a privacy focused messenger app like Signal. It has the same interface, but far stronger encryption and it's open source.

[–] TacticalCheddar@lemm.ee 64 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I must say that American companies are getting better and better at making me ditch their products and services.

Art of the Deal at its finest.

view more: ‹ prev next ›