Susaga

joined 1 year ago
[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I feel like this is related to the meme you just posted about turning an insect swarm spell into a cloud of falling elephants. That's not "player shennanigans", that's theory-crafting a gotcha moment and failing because of how the spells actually work.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a man with a female bestie, this title irks me.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Thanks to this post, I have spent the past few minutes looking at pictures of sticks and going "kwoah, that's a good stick." Time well spent.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Everyone should play through all of it! Eluna and the Moth is amazing! Sunswallower's Wake is amazing! A Walk in the Unlight is amazing! I may like this game just a little bit.

To everyone who never played it, Wildermyth is essentially a story focused, randomly generated fantasy X-COM. You play as a company of heroes crossing the wilderness and hunting down monsters, coming across all the fantastic things therein. Campaigns take in-game decades to finish, so the heroes you start with might retire and their kids might join the fight later on. It's one of those games where I have run out of people irl to recommend it to, so now it's your turn!

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

A few details got changed, but the broad strokes and general spirit was the same. I'm always happy seeing Eiji aware of the romance, but letting her set the pace to something she's comfortable with.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Try flipping your process. Instead of working from the full list and taking things out, start from an empty list and add stuff in. If there isn't a good enough reason for it to be there, don't put it in. And if this leaves you with just humans, that's fine.

I'm not removing githyanki from my game. Githyanki were never in my game.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's a game called Wildermyth where every faction is inherently incompatible with humans, but none of them are inherently evil.

For example, the Gorgons are an empire seeking to reclaim lost territory. This is fair, but they're aquatic, so they need to flood the world to take it back. Humans naturally need to fight them in order to survive, and there's no real way to compromise on that. It doesn't help that they ooze corruption everywhere they go.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago (8 children)

If you can kill something without feeling bad because of its race, that's fucked up. A group of goblin bandits can be fun, but they're villains because of the bandit thing, not the goblin thing. Why should a group defined by plundering travelers be more acceptable than a group defined by being short with green skin?

That said, the undead are, more often than not, fair game. Undead are a mockery of the life that came before and a defilement of their corpse, so killing them is a way of honouring the dead.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone made a point that, in pointing out how Kyle is a murderer, someone would come to defend him. Then you came to defend him, or at least said the exact thing someone trying to defend him would say. When people tried to brush you off, you cried about people not wanting conversations. When they corrected you, you cried about them sticking to a narrative. When they called you out for defending him, you claimed to hate him, then kept defending him. You were identical to a Rittenhouse supporter.

Why does talking about sensitive topics need a disagreement? A death in the family is a sensitive topic, but you don't need to say "I'm glad they died" to talk about it.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Were you even responding to me? Because you disagreed with a point I didn't make and raised a point in response to my answer of that point.

Don't disagree for the sake of disagreement. The devil doesn't need an advocate.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

It kind of is. When someone has an extreme emotional reaction, you should look at what they're reacting to before calling it unreasonable. Any defence of a mass murderer, no matter how civil it pretends to be, warrants an extreme backlash.

Like I said, Lemmy is smaller. People don't notice you on fb, but they notice you here.

Just how many times are you going to ignore your own role in your conversations? You are the common thread among everyone who dislikes you.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

GPT invented a word that would please you. It is not an accurate answer. In fact, the answer it gave is rather insulting, calling mentally ill individuals morons.

view more: ‹ prev next ›