Redacted

joined 1 year ago
[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I love that even in the most fantastical scenario they couldn't envisage anything less than a 4 day work week.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As of 2023, solar energy accounted for about 4.5% of China's total energy consumption.

In 2024 solar energy could account for around 5-6% of China's total energy consumption.

If they add another 170GW in 2025, the percentage could rise to approximately 6-7%.

They hope by 2026 solar will make up 8-9% of the total energy consumption.

If solar is the future then we are screwed because that isn't fast enough growth... and that is without factoring in the rest of the world who will hit nowhere near those numbers.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"I saw it on TV!"

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Took our jerbs, eat our dergs.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
  1. Yeah good shout, I just know certain fans/pundits don't like complicated rules so tried to keep it simple but your method is better.

  2. Sorry, I think I was unclear... Above the end of the sleeve meaning on the sleeve is fine. I don't think that's the current rule as I've seen many recent decisions when they've given handball for the ball hitting the sleeve. If that's not the case, I refer back to #1.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)
  1. VAR has the potential to make the game much better. The refs' interpretations of the subjective rules are the issue. The whole rulebook needs to be rewritten with the aim to eliminate grey areas.

  2. Offside lines should be drawn from the back foot of the attacker. It was designed to stop goalhanging, not to penalise attackers who gain no advantage from being a centimetre offside.

  3. This one I'm not even sure I agree with but here goes... Headers should be banned because repeated knocks to the head are not good. In exchange, anything above the sleeves of the shirt should not be classed as handball.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Whilst it's true solar is growing, it is not likely to be the silver bullet you make out.

Another way to look at the source you linked is that despite the ongoing climate catastrophe the US is still planning to add 4% more fossil fuel sources to their grid next year.

It also leaves out the fact that 84% of the current US power is generated by fossil fuels and that figure is not being reduced.

The source is also very US-centric. If we take the IEA's projections, only 25% of the world's new energy will be from renewable sources in 2024.

Then there's the weird choice of counting battery storage as energy generation. At the end of 2022 half of the battery storage was being powered by fossil fuels so should probably be left out of any statistics.

We need people to understand the true scale of the problem rather than generating more hopium. The energy companies have teams of people for that.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Imagine not starting the season with him in FPL.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I think it means the electric field created within Earth's atmosphere that is responsible for lightning as opposed to the (electro)magnetic field which forms the magnetosphere around Earth and makes compasses work.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why would you expect it to affect productivity when you were working the same number of hours?

It's just slightly increased flexibility under the guise of a 4 day week.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Perhaps we could consider equipping them with emission cannons that blast particulates into the air to keep the temps down. 🫡👍

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Guessing you might have been being rhetorical but I'll give my take anyway... The stabbings were just the spark that ignighted it all.

They do not have a common goal but they are united in thinking immigration levels are too high, despite it being a net benefit to the country. From what I've seen they generally fall into 3 groups:

  1. EDL/BNP/facists/racists who have been whipping up anti-immigration rhetoric forever. Emboldened by extreme language used by Farage, successive Conservative governments and no doubt rhetoric from the convicted felon across the pond. They blamed the stabbings (and every problem ever) on immigrants despite the fact it was carried out by an autistic kid born in this country.

  2. Brexit/Reform voters who see themselves as "more centrist" because they aren't as far-right as #1. They blame years of austerity, worstening living conditions and growing class divide on the idea "the country is full". They thought Brexit was supposed to solve this and are now protesting because it hasn't. They claim it wasn't done properly so voted Reform but got a more centrist government instead. They want to make their dissatisfaction heard but as far as I know do not condone the violence. They might now know the stabbings were not linked to migration but the issue has escalated beyond that incident now.

  3. Young people who are generally not very well informed on any of the issues and have been fed misinformation on their various social media channels encouraging them to join the protests. It's the holidays, they are impressionable and angry. They think they're part of some revolutionary movement or just drunk and up for some chaos so are out with their mates filming it all in their phones for the views. I imagine as they become more informed they will align with #1 or #2.

 

The Starfield preview got me hyped enough to finally cash in a big chunk of my points that I've been accumulating since the Series X was released.

If anyone doesn't use Microsoft Rewards I strongly recommend signing up. It doesn't take much effort to build them up.

They are slowly nerfing the program so might as well take advantage while it lasts.

view more: next ›