Plopp

joined 1 year ago
[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They say Jimmy Carr is best served cold?

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 54 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

As a swede: Word. It's backwards as fuck here. The previous government didn't even want to investigate whether or not to decriminalize, because doing so (investigate, mind you) would "send the wrong signals". Yeeah fuck science and people's lives when you have "signals" to worry about.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The solution is constant googly eyes.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 53 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

When you put it like that... Maybe we shouldn't be so quick to judge.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 147 points 11 hours ago (16 children)

“and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

As someone living in a country whey we don't chop off the foreskin of little children, whereas conservative Americans love that chopping procedure, I find this statement slightly amusing.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Should just be a roll up projector screen and you wear the projector on your forehead like a lamp. Also it's a lamp and you can project directions on the street when you're lost at night.

Fuck Elon I got this. Give me money!

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Y'all are so stuck in the old linear thinking. Be brave, expand your mind. Rubik's cube phone when?

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

That'd be cool. Buy one cheap phone frame, and a pack of 8 screen+electronics assys for $20,000.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I would be really happy if you're right, but I sadly think Google's fine here. As far as I understand it, this particular regulation is to prevent a powerful actor (Google, Apple) to use their monopolistic powers to shut alternative stores down. It's not about allowing customers to install whatever and however. Google doesn't shut anyone down with this, so they should be fine. They give the option for app developers to choose if they want to run only on an attested platform - which they sell as a completely optional security feature that nobody has to use.

My guess is if the EU is going to take this further it would have to be regarding a potential monopoly on the attested platforms on the device. Google only offering their own platform as trusted could potentially be seen as another monopolistic behavior. If we're lucky.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I was thinking it was more to do with dancing

You're thinking of Homo Groovensis, the famous hunter dancerers.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

It's why men's attire meant to look good

Oh so that's where I fuck up.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Should have just put up a sign for cat soup and silently point at it for anyone who still ask.

view more: next ›