NotMyOldRedditName

joined 1 year ago
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That show was awesome.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ya, I imagine many of these highly specific cases would plead out to something not involving jail and/or pedophile record. Stakes are pretty high and that's a big gamble. A case like this it'd be hard to have a sympathetic jury.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The prosecutor needs to convince the jury there was intent. Intent is one of the hardest things to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in court without evidence and motive. It's not a guarantee especially with no history.

Edit: And in this case, a history means you've probably already been convicted as thats what the history would lead to.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors

Section 1466A of Title 18, United States Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene.

Specifically: distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations

By the statute's own terms, the law does not make all fictional child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. The mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the Internet, transported across state lines, or of an amount that showed intent to distribute.[135]

Edit: So it has to be 100% locally generated and never transmitted. You still wouldn't want to try and fight this in court though, I'm sure they'd do their best to throw you in jail, or fabricate an intent to distribute if you'd made a lot, even with all the images you generated to try and get the images you actually wanted.

Edit: Also this is federal, there may be other state laws.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Federal law is creating fictional CSAM at home without transmitting it is legal.

The few AI arrests I've seen they transmitted them.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The only way this would be conceivable is if FSD actually worked, the robot works and change everything we know, or spacex is sending hundreds of ships to Mars each window.

Doesn't seem possible, nor do I think solving only 1 of the above makes it possible.

Edit: or we wait long enough for inflation to make today's assets at a future inflated value be worth that much without losing any of it in the meantime...

The Republicans aren't ignoring women. They're obsessed with them. They are so obsessed they want to control every little thing they do.

Kinda deranged if you ask me. Don't vote for deranged people!

If they're making 3nm in Taiwan, and this unopened factory is 4nm, I imagine they already got 2nm or whatever is next already planned for Taiwan. So it could vary between 1 and 2 generations behind in that case.

... is this real or are you really good at trump gibberish?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Does he realize that women are considered pregnant two weeks prior to conceiving?

They do, and they'll often talk about how many it took to get someone breathing again as a reference to how strong the OD was.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AFAIK merch is often bigger than concerts for the non big names. Local bars etc

view more: ‹ prev next ›