First, the game is not named "Link", now this...
Such a disappointment!
Narann
joined 1 year ago
Il utilise les institutions comme on fait de l'optimisation fiscale : c'est légal™
…and I still have so much cool games to play on it…
Hate de le voir se faire bouffer par le PS…
Idem, il y a une logique qui m'échappe. Un macroniste pour expliquer quand le 49.3 est envisagé ou non ?
Can’t wait for the Fortnite x Mario x Starwars collab…
Uh? Why? That's actually the point of individual 3D printing.
- Card sleeves. Not on all games, but the one you manipulate the cards a lot. My last sleeved game is Sea, Salt & Paper.
- Card playing mat. Makes the card manipulation so much easier on flat tables.
Yes! Digital version are always properly ruled.
But if many players understand the rule in a specific wrong way, it means the rules are badly written.
I totally agree. By physically preventing (or forcing) you to do some actions, it helps you to shape the rules in your mind. To confirm and invalidate what you think.
I can’t recommend enough to write your own rule summary. Write it once, and reorganize it as much as you can with the goal to teach it in a fluent way. Teaching also means giving few components to players when you explain them, simulate actions physically (When you say I draw a card, you draw a card, When you say I push ressource A token here, you push the token, etc.).
With heavy games, players expect the owner to be a teacher. Not everyone is good at this. The owner role is to ensure peoples don’t spend a bad time with the game. Teaching the rules in a engaging way is part of owner responsibility.
This is how I take it. I have few heavy game but I try to learn rules and learn to teach rules as much as I can so players feel confident after first turn.
À la flotte !