LordKitsuna

joined 1 year ago
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately some of my favorite lewd anime artists more or less only share there. So it's either use that for the following feed for manually check their tags one by one daily on gallery sites

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

This is why we have remineralization filters I love my highly insane filtered water. Goes through 10 stages before finally hitting reverse osmosis just to extend the reverse osmosis filter life. But it has a alkaline remineralization as the last step so it tastes amazing

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are amazing but at the end of the day they are still humans and they can make mistakes. In the YouTube video referenced one of the C devs is heavily against rust.

Decided to go look for CVEs from code the guy manages (Ted Ts'o) I found these

CVE-2024-42304 — crash from undocumented function parameter invariants

CVE-2024-40955 — out of bounds read

CVE-2024-0775 — use-after-free

CVE-2023-2513 — use-after-free

CVE-2023-1252 — use-after-free

CVE-2022-1184 — use-after-free

CVE-2020-14314 — out of bounds read

CVE-2019-19447 — use-after-free

CVE-2018-10879 — use-after-free

CVE-2018-10878 — out of bounds write

CVE-2018-10881 — out of bounds read

CVE-2015-8324 — null pointer dereference

CVE-2014-8086 — race condition

CVE-2011-2493 — call function pointer in uninitialized struct

CVE-2009-0748 — null pointer dereference

Do you see a pattern in the type of error here? It's pretty much entirely memory related and right in the wheelhouse of something rust would just outright not allow short of just slapping everything into unsafe blocks.

The Old Guard is not perfect, and they are acting as a barrier to new talent coming in. Sometimes change is good and I'm heavily in the camp that rust one of those times. Linus seems to agree as he allowed the code into the kernel which he would never do lightly or just because it's fomo

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm actually using a cheat freezer, it's brand new too lol. I'm pretty sure the ice-cream gods just hate me

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where are you finding this magic ice-cream. I fucking love soft fluffy ice-cream but everything i buy turns to stone in short order.

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nah, you just turn your living room into a raised bed garden. Forage through dumpsters, hunt stray City cats and fish aquariums that people keep near windows. Easy

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is hilarious because Bluey is a girl

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

"woman are not in the tournament of my own life"

.... Pretty sure my phone just roasted me

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Look, sometimes 15+min of texting back n forth can be more easily solved with 3min of call. I prefer text but sometimes ya just need a call lol

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Some commuter Express routes operate on very limited stops so depending on when you got on you may very well have gotten on right before they hit the freeway and don't stop till the next town

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So just a thought, if they are looking for highly optimized keywords that can be done locally what's to stop them from adding common keywords for advertising.

In the given anecdote about babies and diapers, you would literally just need a baby keyword. It gets triggered phone tells the Mothership it heard about babies, suddenly diaper ads. It wasn't listening to every single word, it wasn't parsing the sentence, it was just looking for highly optimized ad keywords. You could even set a threshold for how often certain add keywords or triggered to avoid false positives on detection

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's true technical analysis does show the opposite, however it's a technical analysis. AKA Engineers making educated guesses. Which is the reason the FCC allowed a limited test area to run actual trials to verify. And the fact that the FCC has not immediately shut it down implies that they have not been able to confirm what that technical analysis predicted.

Don't get me wrong I'm no big huge fan of starlink over here, but both AT&T and Verizon have a long standing history of competing through litigation rather than actual service so I'm inclined to give T-Mobile and starlink the benefit of the doubt here.

When everyone was first getting new frequency opened up AT&T and Verizon fought over millimeter wave while T-Mobile mostly ignored it and went for the mid band 600-800mhz. This caused the T-Mobile to have an insane lead over actual 5G deployment you can now get good 5G speeds out in the middle of rural fuck nowhere because you'll be on the 700 band 12.

Meanwhile millimeter wave is still useless because a piece of rice paper will block the signal entirely so it only works in extremely extremely limited areas of town with direct line of sight and no obstacles to the Tower. So Verizon and AT&T started complaining to the FCC that T-Mobile has too much spectrum and they can't possibly compete even though they made absolutely no attempt whatsoever during the initial bidding to get any mid-band.

Now we see the same thing here, T-Mobile is getting ahead of everyone Verizon and AT&T are lagging behind they plan to roll out the exact same service, with the exact same frequencies, with the exact same technology, however they are still in the planning phase and starlink/t-mobile is just about ready to activate it so they are complaining

view more: ‹ prev next ›