LarsIsCool

joined 3 months ago
[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Not oc, but thank you for explaining

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The circle one is my favorite piece!

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean by europe/german language?

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I couldn't when I was younger. Now I can, but not for more than 2 seconds

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

If we allow a bit more freedom in the wording, we also have the following:

"The letter after [K,O]"

"The letter before [L,P]"

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But currently it is 2025, how do you explain that?

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

given / is a directory

Can it not be a directory? How?

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

To answer the question: The professor assumes the email referred to 1900-1910 with "late 1900s". As this was normal 20 years ago (and still gets used). He then gets upset realising the age difference between him and his student was likely the main contributor to this incorrect assumption.

To ask a question back: From https://www.bucknell.edu/fac-staff/john-penniman, I read:

John Penniman is Associate Professor and chair of Religious Studies

I would say for religious studies it should be fine. But also for other areas, why can't you use 1994 papers?

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I fully agree!

[–] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In person timed tests suffer from people under performing because of external circumstances. Also we should consider chatgpt as a tool that can be used like a calculator. If the answer to a test can be easily retrieved for a widely available tool, the test is only measuring performance that is no longer required. Where possible, ideally measuring performance is based on their skill during a larger time period regardless of the tools they might use. For example repeated in-person peer review sessions (without a specific time slot) could both improve once performance and generating evidence of performance over time while reducing effort from the staff

view more: next ›