I separate work under capitalism from community directed, individually motivated, anarchially organised work. Hence the first edit.
Learning is a requirement of productivity, productivity cannot exist without learning, therefore learning is productive.
I don't think people have an issue with work, they have an issue with the current state.
See, I would classify learning for learning's sake to be productive.
And, yes, that's exactly what I was trying to say
As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.
He didn't leak, he published.
That's what's so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.
If precedent was set they could kidnap anyone from sovereign countries based on US law
And even the things you have achieved are meaningless, people probably didn't like it, and you're still so bad at the NEW THING, why evén get öut ofbed
I appreciate your optimism and it's the correct approach. I think the consensus is it's optimistic.
I think medical advancement could be as dramatic this century was in the last. However, patent law is likely to hold us back
This comment seems contentious. Are the differences in opinion political? An ideological opposition?
.
Thank you for your comment, it provided more context than the article
Ritzy shit, I'm cooking up dried beans at 2 $/kg
I love you mate, hope you have a good day
I feel like kj would stray into an overly technical area. Cool, yeah, but probably not what people worry about.
A sat fat / cholesterol graph might be interesting as well.