No such thing. Even if you were walking on a surface with no change in elevation, the acceleration due to gravity would cause your path to be curved as it followed the curvature of the planet.
I_Has_A_Hat
joined 7 months ago
No way in hell it's gonna be blue if a literal genocide supporter is the candidate
Remind me again what the other candidate's position is.
Half-and-half is for cowards. Either cut the cream entirely or get full cream.
Not to cast doubt, but how exactly did you do that? How did you get glitter into the pressurized compartment? What exactly is the propellant agent that's mixed with the glitter? I guess it could be one of those old types that just sprays water, but you don't typically "recharge" those. That's something you do with the chemical extinguishers.
They only hate him now because he's endorsed Kamala
I don't get it, this isn't even the first time he's admitted he's lost. Tomorrow he'll go right back to saying it was stolen. He changes his tune all the fucking time! What makes this particular time the one that's got all his sycophant's panties in a bunch?
Because while both are shit, under capitalism I can at least say it's shit without fear of incarceration or reeducation.
they invented paper, fireworks, and the compass
Lol, yea. And Timbuktu used to be the world capital of trade, now it's just a shit hole in the middle of the desert.
Sure I'm a NATO apologist: I'm sorry NATO is necessary because Russia is such an antagonistic fuckwad.
But there's still a human behind the wheel. AI hasn't gone rogue and is creating stuff 100% autonomously. Someone still has to give it prompts and make various tweaks to get it to generate the image they want. There is still human intentions and choices being made.
That's what I mean by definitions that try to exclude AI art fall flat, because AI is a tool. Nothing more. We don't dismiss digital artists for not using ink or paint. We don't say people who create impressive 3D printed works aren't being creative because they aren't using a hammer and chisel. People have access to digital instruments and can create whole songs by mixing them from their phone, we don't claim it's not music.
AI is a tool. An actual human person prompts it and manipulates it to create a work. It's infinitely faster than previous methods of creating art, and takes a hell of a lot less training and experience, but it's still art. For better or worse, it's still humans sharing their intentions, thoughts, and emotions with the world.
A thought provoking work that conveys a strong emotion or sense.
As there are many AI images that involve a sense of beauty, disgust, wonder, hatred, or intrigue; yes.
AI is creating art.
Any definition that tries to exclude AI art must jump through hoops to explain why the restriction doesn't also apply to traditional works. And if your definition has to twist itself and constantly make exceptions, then it's just a poor definition.
Be better about recognizing obviously fake shit.