I dunno, it doesn't seem to overstate its case
While not all films, television shows, photographs, and music videos that use this lighting intend to portray bisexuality, many queer artists have deliberately used this color palette
It also uses sources such as Vice and the BBC
I wouldn't call it a high quality article, like at all, but I also wouldn't call it factually incorrect.
E10 has an energy density of 108,608 BTU/gal and E15 has an energy density of 106,814 BTU/gal.
source: http://www.airimprovement.com/reports/national-e15-analysis-final.pdf
This gives us tha the 88 octane has 106.8/108.6 ≈ 0.983 times the energy density of the 87.
1-0.983 = 0.017
The correct number is that the 88 needs to be 1.7% cheaper than 87 to give equivalent distance per dollar.
LLMs are fantastic tech, good at many things. Math is not one of those things.
Without examples it's hard to say anything at all beyond guesses really.
But if the article is about a xitter meme, tweets are the original source, and therefore perfectly relevant citations.
Some people just dislike misinformation, regardless of whether it aligns with their world view.
There are plenty of real reasons homosexuality is natural, why invent fake ones?
okay so I had AI do the math for me.
"I drove a screw with a hammer"
oh my god thanks for linking that, the full body workout thread is truly painful!
I have died on dumber hills than arguing for 1 + 1 = 5.
What about gases, are gases wet or dry?
You say a gas is wet if it contains water, ok what about if the gas contains mercury, is that wet? Is pure liquid mercury wet or dry?
hahah yeah, ~50% is the new 1%, that's certainly economically viable...
if you think you know what they're testing for, you've been lied to.
Nah, it's literally an old english word for elephant.
I'm not sure you know what that word means