FiskFisk33

joined 1 year ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

no, what, whyy? :(

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 23 points 3 months ago

missing a Dun in all the first three lines, and what is the rest supposed to be?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 3 months ago

tbf, social engineering is also a tool in the hackers arsenal heh

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 58 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

oh no, meme aside, that does look awfully like a warning written in blood

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 3 months ago

or achieved unsuccessfully?

i cant decide

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

...i don't believe you.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 3 months ago

in tab completion I trust...

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

well, since the voting is public it's easy to remove your votes and block your instance after the fact

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago

I've learned today kbin and mbin exposes it to users too

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 3 months ago (5 children)

hmm, how would the receiving instance verify? what happens if I send 100 random hashes?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 23 points 3 months ago (7 children)

That would be great. I'm not sure how to solve the problems that arises though. If i can send an anonymous vote to an instance, what stops me from sending 100?
Maybe there's some smart cryptographical solution here that alludes me, but it seems hard, if possible.

view more: ‹ prev next ›