Which one is it???
Evil_Shrubbery
joined 10 months ago
Taken down?
Like for US users?
I bet I can go find one with Lacoste & Polo branding (actually "Lowcoste" and "PoIo" probably, both very fitting actually).
Unlike you, I have lunch with all my demons at once.
None of us likes it all that much, but it's still good to have someone to talk to.
A: Being alive, being part of the economy and social structures, etc.
You know, humans.
Nobody needs to earn money. That by default means those who cannot earn money by current local financial sentiments, are worthless. Yet everyone is worthless if there is nobody spending "earned" money.
The 'poor' spend relatively more money than the rich, and they tend to do that locally, they pay more taxes, produce labour, etc.
Ie all the money gets recirculated into the local economy, which (the local companies) can then invest or compete better.
Rich don't do any that or at a fraction of the poor. And additionally it's easier to stash money offshore, invest & support companies doing shady stuff etc.
Giving money to big private corps literally never worked better that giving money to all local companies and/or citizens.
The former is just a transfer from citizens who earned money to a few private citizens.
But, for example, what do investors do to earn our money?
I just pace money I have in excess somewhere & demand from their CEOs to cut costs by 14,3% or they are fired.
That ads financial value, but at what actual cost?
However, investors take advantage of/rely on the poor spending their money by taking it and concentrating it, which makes that money a lot more dead compared to it being spent.
Step by step, capitalism too stronk.
But hopefully very soon.
Lul, all that money not being transferred to like 10 already rich people, but to all people??
It's like they want to actually boost economy and living standards.
Even when the same people need to get money from people they don't wanna pay (or there aren't any buyers), this is still the case.
So if GDP doesn't come from nature (which it shouldn't, at least net shouldn't), the system cannot work with financial wealth being the only goal.
But it can work long enough to destroy much of everything everywhere.
But that's where the money is!!
(Until it's not)
Ok but point 4 is a bit too based for GS.
Tho I have been arguing that at some point ("voluntary") consumption just collapses over average sentiment. Eg over bad living and working conditions, or just a hopelessly depressive environment (like, I don't wanna buy slave chocolate).
Best cat, best hub, best lore, best hexes, best my little ponies.
Hahaha, keep your smug smiles 25 ad babies, you are next to hit 2ky!!
I think this is the way and not an overkill at all!
Its super easy to swarm ProxMox, and you make your inevitable admin job easier. Not to mention backups, first testing & setting up a VM on your server before copying it to their, etc.