Seriously: why are you under the impression my initial comment or the message were only about Zionism?
BTW, Zionism as we know it today was coined in the 19th century by Theodor Herzl. Maybe you should open up a book for once instead of repeating easy summaries.
Deutsche Wohnen und Vonovia enteignen und Sozialwohnungsbau intensivieren. Warum ist das eigentlich keine mehrheitsfähige Position in unserer Politik?
We can agree about the historical continuity in the region. I don’t think however, that Zionism in itself is a new attempt at colonialism. The romans, crusader states and babylonians did likewise. They lacked the weapons and men however to implement it at such a scale. Montefiore has an interesting source from a scholar during the crusades whom I musst paraphrase from memory im afraid since I don’t have his book at hand: „the streets of the Armenian quarter ran knee high with blood when the crusaders came, indiscriminately killing their christian brothers.
Historical continuances aren’t your thing aren’t they? History is nothing but connection and ideas. To give you some perspective:
Current German ownership disputes between the church and the government can be traced back to inheritance disputes that arose because of the fall of the Roman Empire.
As per my other comment:
That is not what I’m saying. The greater Jerusalem area has been in conflict for millennia. It’s shrouded in a different veil over time, but the core conflict remains over control of the Middle East, specifically access to the Mediterranean and control of the trading routes between Africa, Asia and Europe. Over the years this has become entangled with religious fanatische, but at its core, it’s the same conflict that’s been going on since people first settled the region.
Theodor Herzls ideas concerning the region are in no way new or original. He’s making basically the same argument as the church prior to the first crusade.
That is not what I’m saying. The greater Jerusalem area has been in conflict for millennia. It’s shrouded in a different veil over time, but the core conflict remains over control of the Middle East, specifically access to the Mediterranean and control of the trading routes between Africa, Asia and Europe. Over the years this has become entangled with religious fanatische, but at its core, it’s the same conflict that’s been going on since people first settled the region.
It’s closer to 5000 years, the only time when the area was really peaceful for a long period of time was when romans destroyed the temple in 71 AD.
They are under the assumption that both sides are equally bad and want to see it all burn down I think. They don’t think much further however.
Sieht aus wie Scheiße, richt wie Scheiße, ist wahrscheinlich Scheiße. Oder wie es früher hieß: „Wehret den Anfängen“. Wer die Parallelen zwischen den beiden nicht sehen kann hat in Geschichte gepennt oder ist selbst Nazi.
Was muss die AfD denn noch tun damit solche Leute verstehen, dass die die Schwelle zur Gewalt längst überschritten haben? Noch einen Holocaust?
Im Sinne aller Arbeiter: Excel sheet und karton oder stechuhr?
Zumindest einen bezahlbaren Wohnungsmarkt zu schaffen wäre schon ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung. Die Idee, das Grundbedürfnisse zur Gewinnerzielung Weniger missbraucht werden können ist in meinen Augen absolut pervers. Los warum den Wohnungsmarkt nicht nach tatsächlichen Bedürfnissen ausrichten als nach dem Geldbeutel?