ComradeKhoumrag

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Are you really going to be that pedantic? to ignore my point that a lot of drug use is committed by the us Dollar by that 8%? You are a child

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago (7 children)

92%, I may have used the word literally figuratively, but so does every other American

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contaminated_currency#%3A%7E%3Atext%3DResults_demonstrated_that_%2292%25_of%2C0.01-922.72_%CE%BCg_per_bill.?wprov=sfla1

That's the proof man, it's literally on the bills. We can literally see it

Also, what do you mean keep my story straight next time? It's not controversial at all that the US gets involved in military conflicts for oil or financial control (neorealism, neoliberalism). Oil is just one of the many incentives which makes the USD arguably dirty

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 0 points 2 months ago (9 children)

The US Dollar is not only backed by oil, but also American banking imperialism.

Im against the war on drugs too. But speaking of drugs, weed is schedule 1, where Xanax is schedule 4 (low risk of abuse). It's completely upside down and not accurate. That said, the harmfulness of the substance and being for or against the war on drugs is completely separate from the fact that there's cocaine on literally every single dollar bill. Money is the dirtiest thing in general, and by those metrics, the US Dollar is dirtier

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

There's cocaine on literally every US Dollar and that currency is backed by oil, relatively speaking crypto is cleaner

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It depends on the feminist, but feminism itself is actually pretty egalitarian

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago

What's funny is that Palestinians are literally Semitic

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago

China meets the manufacturing needs for most of the world, it's economically not realistic to boycott them

That said, we still should boycott them, at least in principle.

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While applying it where most shitcoins have applied Blockchain, I agree it's all hype. But Blockchain doesn't solve a non-existent problem.

Trusting humans is an inherent security flaw. Blockchain solves that problem. You don't have to trust banks to not shortsell the housing market with your own money (causing a recession for the entire world) if you could cut humans out of the equation.

Forget money. Say the data that you want to be able to transact and operate on is health data instead of financial information. You could create a decentralized identity system based on people's biometric information. From there, you could automate and decentralize governance in general.

Suggesting Blockchain solves a non-existent problem is like suggesting Lemmy solves a non-existent problem

view more: ‹ prev next ›