CapriciousDay

Taking the ability of GPs to write sick notes away will be massively counter productive. For one thing, sick notes actually preserve many people's jobs, giving them the time and energy to recuperate. Pushing sick people down a bureaucratic nightmare when they're already sick is going to be counterproductive, not to mention the taxpayer money that will be thrown away to a private operator to administrate this. This will end up with people's careers being terminated for things that the current system lets you recover from.

The ideology around this is clear when you consider the government's focus on getting people with long term mental health conditions into work, apparently without doing anything to improve mental health support. They state they want business to "support mental health" and we all know what that looks like: an e-learning module nobody will pay attention, some nice posters to and maybe a mental health support line with no power to actually support you in anything.

But that's not to forget the real root cause of these issues: young people falling into despair as they realise that even if they do spend most of their waking lives working, they will still not be able to afford their own housing and bills. They will still end up chased by debt collectors. They will still live miserably.

Many of the profits collected by the companies people in the UK will work for, today, will end up going into the hands of the companies of fascist America. Too many roles are frivolous profit making activities or serving shallow whims. There is no pride to be had in many of the working opportunities in the UK.

Any honest review into this situation will reveal this reality as the key driver behind the situation.

Or maybe a catchier name would be a "basic human decency GPL extension"

I can't help but notice that organisations constantly co-opt free software which was developed with the intent to promote freedom, use it to spread hate and ideas which will ultimately infringe on freedom for many.

The fact that hateful people who use such software may then go on to use it to promote or otherwise support fascism which prevents others from enjoying the software in the way it was imagined, is one potential manifestation of the paradox of tolerance in this respect. I think this is particularly true for e.g. social media platforms and the fediverse.

My proposal to combat this would be the introduction of a "paradox of tolerance" license which says that organisations which use the software must enforce a bare-minimum set of rules to combat intolerance. So anti-racism, anti-homophobia, anti-transphobia, etc. The idea is then to make overtly hateful organisations legally liable for the use of the software through the incompatibility of the requirements with their hateful belief system.

This could be an extension to GPL and AGPL where the license must be replicated in modified versions of the software, thereby creating virality with these rules.

Is this a thing already? I understand OS and FOSS have historically had a thing for political neutrality but are we not starting to find the faults with this now?

iCloud backdoor mandated by the UK. We have to ask the question: if MI5 has access to this today, won't Reform have access to it tomorrow?

We even have Elon Musk trying to get to Reform aligned with Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson), an already far-right party currently polling very well.

We have to act as though an overtly far-right government is coming to the UK some time before 2030 and if that's the case: our government and judiciary need to stop laying the groundwork for them today.