BearOfaTime

joined 1 year ago
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Crazy to me there's no guard on that fan. Even one with large openings, chicken-wire type (but stronger) would've prevented whatever got in there to cause the blades to break.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

To control what can be accessed.

Having your own DNS enables you to block ads on every device in your network.

PiHole makes my smart TV more responsive, because it can't get crap to load into the home screen.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago

Unless they meant that individual images had less AI generation in them.

(I'm with you, words matter)

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Clearly, you made some change.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Securing user data is easy enough if you do not collect it to begin with.

Bingo.

As if de-anonymizing hasn't been demonstrated, repeatedly.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hahahaha, you're funny.

Because people suddenly become altruistic, and won't try to fuck over the next person?

UBI won't fix human nature.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I've always said this about software. Let me license a specific version, with free minor updates until the next major release.

If the new version has something I need/want, I may be willing to buy it again.

I use lots of old software, on my PC and my phone. It works, why do I need the new version? And some, the new version sucks so bad I refuse to upgrade (FolderSync on Android, for example).

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Says who?

Plenty of sites out there just run by people who want to run them, no fee, no ads.

It's people who want to capitalize on having a website that have this problem.

And let's be clear, it's their problem. Not mine. If they can't turn a profit with/without ads, that's not my concern, that's theirs. But they setup these web sites/services with the intention of making money through ads and surveillance, so let's not go around acting like these orgs just won't make it without us (there are exceptions, say archive.org, and guess what, people donate to them because they believe in the cause).

The problem is a bunch of people figured out the web was a brilliant way to data mine for profit. I actually had this discussion with a friend circa 1993. If we could see it then, imagine how many other people already had plans.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

What's making it personal?

Stop being a sophist, you'll have more meaningful conversations.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

So 31% uses ad blocking.

That's about 1/3. Pretty impressive actually.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Surveillance advertisement was already around.

Social Media platforms simply capitalized on it.

And users sucked it up for "convenience".

 

Cross-posted from Health

30
Project Liberty (www.projectliberty.io)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by BearOfaTime@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

From their About page:

Project Liberty is stitching together an ecosystem of technologists, academics, policymakers and citizens committed to building a people-powered internet—where the data is ours to manage, the platforms are ours to govern, and the power is ours to reclaim.

I just heard Frank McCourt on a podcast plugging his book "Our Biggest Fight".

It was great to hear someone with a voice talking about the problems we see with user data and social media, especially the problem of the Social Graph (the map of all your social connections, which includes weights and values).

Their solution to this problem was to develop a social networking protocol that enables any compliant app to use (think how email works - a standard protocol, SMTP), but encrypted and user data controlled by the user. They call it DSNP - Decentralized Social Networking Protocol.

I see both sides of their approach, I'm kind of ambivalent, lots of concern here long-term.

They've already acquired MeWe and have converted some users to this protocol. He wants to buy the US side of TikTok (if it becomes available) and convert it to DSNP, which would encrypt about 30 million US accounts.

I'm always cynical about stuff that sounds promising, but I don't have the tech background to really dissect what they're doing. Anyone understand this better?

 

I have no idea where to even start to combat such things. Healthcare professionals must appease the masses of their peers.

I've seen this first hand in the corporate world, where it's called a 360 review. It's a popularity contest.

While there's value in the idea of such reviews, they're ripe for abuse. It codifies an environment of dishonesty - where people who are good at masking (err, sociopaths anyone) excel.

view more: next ›