this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Fediverse

17580 readers
125 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I suppose this may make sense in the case of something like Mastodon. But something as versatile and customizable as lemmy, which allows for the existence of separate topic-based communities, makes topic-based instances of lemmy not necessary.

Instead of making a new instance for a certain topic, it is usually a much better approach to just create a new community on my current lemmy instance. At least from my perspective as a user.

I find the only exception to this is censorship and moderation. If I, for any reason am unhappy with an instance's moderation and censorship, then that is the only potential reason I can see to change and make my own.

What does everyone else think of this?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roho@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. Lemmy Hoste multiple communities on a single instance. This gives room for interaction with people thinking different than you. That's i.m.o. positive.

I learned In fediverse there's much ignore lists and exclusion of servers happening. I'd much rather have users personally choose which communities/users not to see than whole servers being excommunicated for them(unless it's spam servers ofcourse). Excluded Servers clusters(islands) are a breeding ground for mindset that the whole world thinks likewise(because there's no notion of other servers). In my opinion cancel-culture is detrimental to society. Documentary "The social dilemma" has shown that; eg Facebook which, for add revenue, targets info only to users who are already interested. This breeds anti social/extreme mindsets.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that there are islands on the fediverse. Yes, some servers block very liberally, but If their admins choose it this way, aren't they free to do so?

Most servers only block a few troll, Nazi and pedo servers and that's it.

I think that it's only fair that the people providing the service are those who get to shape the content that their server provides.

Who is unfairly blocked in your opinion? Do you have an example?

[–] roho@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hi. Thx for the heads up. Indeed server hosters are free to do what they wish. I don't have examples. I saw a video quite a while back, explaining quite some difficulties with moderation on fediverse. I'll search for it.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Moderation is pretty difficult, since theoretically everyone can spin up a troll server within minutes :)

[–] seppoenarvi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing I'm struggling the most with getting into Fediverse is that I have to create an account on a specific instance. I don't identify myself as part of a single community. I'm interested in several different topics and active in different communities. I guess it doesn't matter that much which instance I select, but somehow I have to select one instance.

[–] _ed@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On lemmy it generally doesn't matter as much, given the ALL tab. But you have to still consider which instances your local might be blocking...

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, one example was gtio.io, which occasionally had a decent topic or two, but about a third of the userbase was from lemmy.ml and another third from wolfballs.com (the former instance which attracted a political 'right-wing' userbase). Since lemmy.ml defederated from wolfballs.com, you wouldn't even see most of the replies from a lemmy.ml account and have to get an extra account somewhere to reply.

Of course, those replies were almost always low-quality garbage, but I did want to see and reply to them!