Not The Onion

16102 readers

1083 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

159

Trump's AG Claims She Will Release More Epstein Docs, but They May Be Redacted for National Security (gizmodo.com)

submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 59 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They may be redacted as to not implicate the president?

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 23 points 2 months ago

Haven't we already confirmed Trump's in the flight logs with his daughter?

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 49 points 2 months ago

What information could possibly be relevant to national security?

It's just names.

Any reaction means it's a member of the administration, because they aren't going to protect anyone else.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is it too much to hope that they fuck up, redacting the names by drawing a box over text in a PDF?

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Sounds perfectly realistic to me!

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

They dont make that mistake on account of the software they use literally not allowing that.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Anywhere you see a black bar, especially when it's coupled with a underaged girl, it's safe to assume and put Trump's name in place of it and reposting it back on Facebook and X.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago

████████████ Bill and Crooked Hillary Clinton █████████████████████████████████████. ███████████████████████████████████.

██████████████████████████████████████████████ buttery males, ████████████████████████ at which point Jeffrey Epstein then committed suicide, just trust me bro.

A convincing facsimile of the documents to be released

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They really thought Trump would ever do this? He's the most likely person to burn them.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Is there any need though? All the people they care about probably have full immunity from anything.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago

I love the unedited fox news interview

Would you release the Epstein files?

Uh... Well... Uh... Maybe? Yeah, I think I would, but I'd have to take a closer look, it could cause problems for people. But yeah...I think I would. Yeah.

After rapid fire "yes" to every other document they asked about, it really stands out

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

everyone knows donald was a frequent flier there.