this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
85 points (96.7% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2158 readers
209 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The new research indicates that it works by interfering with a brain’s “dynamic stability”—a state where neurons can respond to input, but the brain is able to keep them from getting too excited. 

To find out how propofol achieves that disruption, the MIT team looked at electrical recordings from parts of the brain tied to vision, sound processing, spatial awareness, and executive function in animals that had been dosed with the drug. They then compared those measurements to some that were taken before propofol was administered. 

They found that the conscious animal brains showed increased neural activity after input like a sound or a new sight and then returned to a baseline level. But under the effects of propofol, the brain did some odd things. Previous research has shown that animals given the drug lose consciousness but maintain cognition and brain activity—basically, your brain can still process things like sound and smell, even if you’re not aware of it. The team, which published their findings on Monday in the journal Neuron*, *found that this effect may be due to the brain taking longer to return to its baseline after a sensory input while on the anesthetic, sending brain activity “into chaos,” as one neuroscientist put it.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Fascinating!

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They've been winging it all this time??

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You'd be amazed at how much of science, medicine, hell even software programming, is "we have no idea why this happens but that's not going to stop us from doing it anyway."

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Humanity = space orcs.

Example Et. Al.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Sometimes, science is more art than science.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Well, it's not like not knowing why means it isn't reliable and proven. Are you winging it every time you jump and don't end up in space?

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So if we can sense everything under anesthesia, are we just traumatizing our subconscious?

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s the general idea behind Dianetics, they say you sub-consciously pick up all input when you are unconscious and it shapes your personality. It’s a load of bullshit psychology and is the basis of Scientology.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

and is the basis of Scientology.

Well, that and aliens.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I wonder if we got to kick start the same mechanism on someone in a koma? By flushing their brains with the opposite basically, or at least on the effected brain area.