this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
1090 points (96.3% liked)

Work Reform

11889 readers
671 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 74 points 3 months ago

I have multiple times had the experience of explaining to non-Americans elements of our system, and they simply don’t believe me. They think I’m making it up to fuck with them because it’s so atrocious that it couldn’t be real.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 55 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

“In America, they take your money for bombs and billionaires.”

[–] t_chalco@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Dumb question, what is this meme format about?

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeonmi Park, DPRK defector and conservative media darling. Claims of her life in North Korea are debated hotly- things along the lines of they eat rats and the like.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeonmi_Park

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My favorite bit is that she's well known for her exaggerations about the DPRK, yet will say US college campuses run by liberals "remind her of it." That's why conservatives love her so much and why she makes good money, and why other defectors have criticized her for essentially spinning tales in a way that ends up undermining actual struggles in North Korea, or distorting their character for profit.

[–] t_chalco@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So, the joke here is that you've got someone, presumably a Chinese official, saying a reality about America in a startling way that sounds like completely cooked up propaganda but isn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Kind of has a point that modern "communist" systems in practice seem identical to all the bad parts of Capitalism.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Phrase I picked up from Well There's Your Problem: centrally unplanned economy.

One company, Baxter, makes 95% of the saline IV solution for the US. Most of it comes from one factory in Marion, N.C. It has been hit by natural disasters before and caused shortages. One happened just this past few months.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I donate plasma twice a week and there were rations for the past couple of months on saline. Instead of getting refilled with saline after the donation, we had to eat gold fish drink and drink a Powerade before the donation and drink a Powerade and sit for 15 min after. Last week was the first time they started doing saline again.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Tbqh the saline is only necessary because a lot people aren't sufficiently hydrated in the first place. That Gatorade did basically the same thing on a ~24 hour delay.

Ofc, that's easier to say for people with a decent amount of blood volume in the first place, and for people who aren't losing that much plasma on a regular schedule.

Be very careful about donating that frequently if it's a regular thing btw. Citrate reactions have compounding effects over time on bone density, it's why civilized countries don't let you sell or donate plasma as often as America does.

Technically speaking all of the warning material they make you sign tells you this, but in my experience they're pretty shifty about making sure donors actually understand the risks.

Best thing you can do is to buy some Tums/chalk tablets and eat one before you donate. If you ever get a tingling feeling in your lips while donating it's because the citrate anti-coagulant is binding with the calcium in your blood that is supposed to be going to your daily needs, the Tums both works pretty quick to relieve the tingling and makes sure you're getting enough calcium to negate the loss.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your problem is neither capitalism nor communism.

Your problem is greedy cunts. Both systems will end up putting them in charge.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

That's because people who aren't greedy don't seek that kind of position.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

I literally had to tell people libertarianism fails harder and faster than communism was getting weird stares until I told them about the book "a libertarian walks into a bear"

I still look like a raging communist but idc

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Socialism: A system of government where the country's wealth is concentrated into a small, ruling class of billionaires, who use the media they own to keep the lower classes fighting with each other while they . . . the rich . . . run off with all the farking money.

Oh wait. that's capitalism. I don't know how I got those two systems confused.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I watched a video that had dr. Robotnik say how is going to take over the US Healthcare system and make it hell... then shadow keeps interjecting to tell him that his plans are actually a vast improvement over the system, and Robotnik is then left unsure what to think.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why would you do this? Why provide a link to the youtube video but have it hyperlink to this post?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

Even better, since his IQ is like 300

[–] OutsiderInside@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Why does everyone think the only alternative to capitalism is communism?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

American brains have been shaped into 2-lane highways.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Because of successful anti-anarchist propaganda, an overwhelming majority of Americans think anarchy means no rules whatsoever.

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mean what do you propose, I mean I personaly do not want to regress farther to fudalism

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Heavily regulated socialist democracy.

Provide basic needs, food, clothing, healthcare, childcare, and education. Hell even a phone and Internet access.

Emphasis on the basic.

Allow for those who do not wish to, or are unable to work to live with all basic needs covered. Those who wish to work are incentivized to do so, with access to luxuries. Better housing, better clothing, better technology. Allow a place for the market, but don't make people depend on the market.

No reason to work a job you hate, no reason to employ people you don't need. Everybody wins.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Socialism is when the government is nice to you bottom text

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, you're almost speaking of the exact system Marxists want to work towards, just with the caveat that Marxists think Markets are only useful tools in less-developed and less-critical industries temporarily, before public ownership and planning becomes more efficient, and that the spread in difference between "luxuries" decreases over time as productivity improves to account for that. The whole "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs" bit that requires extremely developed industry to achieve.

Marxists aren't opposed to increased pay for more skilled or more intense labor, rather, such a system is a necessity until sufficient automation and industrialization allow for more goods and services to be free.

Have you read Marx, or Marxists?

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I've read The Expanse lol. I was describing the system on Earth in that series.

The thing is, markets predate the written word. Some form of trading is literally one of the first things humans did. It could even be a prehuman invention. Eliminating markets is like trying to eliminate prostitution, or drugs.

Markets, much like life, uhh... Find a way.

Instead of turning up your nose, make them work for you, in a way you want. We don't want the markets to spread, unrestrained, like kudsu. We want Bonsai markets.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

This.

Also, extremely agressive measures to stop the harm of others through the accumumation of mass wealth.

Basically, once you reach, I dunno, 5-10 million total "worth", you get taxed at 100%.

Something like that. No one will ever need that much ever, and they can feel free to just reture and live out their life doing nothing if they manage to get there.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThisIsMyLemmyLogin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's just Americans. They can only think of 2 options; this or that. Democrat or Republican. Capitalism or Communism. Good or evil. Simple binary choices.

There are countries in Europe which are ruled by a coalition of 3 or 4 political parties. Very few Americans would be comfortable with something so complicated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think everyone believes that, there are many Anarchists that don't agree with Marxists, and there's broad diversity within Capitalist thought, Anarchist thought, and Marxist thought. For example, Anarchists take issue with hierarchy above all else, and so wish to establish generally a horizontal, decentralized network of communes, while Marxists take issue with Class, and so wish to have a fully publicly owned and planned economy run along democratic lines, ie everyone in the world will share equal ownership of all industry.

The reason why you may be seeing more Marxists is generally because Marxism has played the most widespread and significant role as an alternative to Capitalism in modern history.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›