this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
6 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
3065 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I know some artists don't mind it, but I just can't hear the word "creatives" as anything other than silicon valley speak for the source of the content they sell. It feels dehumanizing.

Particularly in this case, it's Adobe, so you can just call them artists, designers, photographers, etc.

Or, ya know, just users.

[–] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

In fairness, it’s Wired who called them creatives, while Adobe called them artists.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Stallman was right

I wonder what state FOSS replacements for Adobe software would be in if a significant percentage of Adobe users used their subscription money to donate to FOSS replacements instead.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The ironic thing is that if it weren't for free software, the entire AI industry would likely be a decade behind where it is today, if not more.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

That's true for all IT industries. All IT stands on the shoulders of FOSS.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Because they will. They literally will.

Adobe is one of the most awful, insidious, evil corporations in the software space and they have done absolutely nothing to claw back even a tiny shred of good faith.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

We won't do that, we promise.

[–] 555@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Affinity Photo, Affinity Designer, Affinity Publisher

Sorry, no linux versions.

[–] MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wish I could switch to Affinity, Publisher just isn’t quite there yet in a print production environment.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How so? Genuinely curious what’s missing as someone who tried it on a job, and loved it.

I just sent a job to print yesterday and the printer didn’t bat an eye.

Are we talking specific types of printing? Like booklets or runs with specific imposition needs or something else?

I think ultimately it will depend on what one needs printed. It would easily meet most common printing requirements as far as I can tell.

[–] MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You guessed it with booklets or anything long format really.

As a 20+ year Adobe user, I tried switching about a year ago. Seems like the only way to give it proper go, was to dive in head first and force myself to exclusively use Affinity. Of course there’s a bit of a (frustrating) learning curve but overall it went pretty smooth. I genuinely thought I was going to make it work.

That was until I had to setup a 40 page catalog. Ran into various minor issues, but not insurmountable. IIRC the main issue that ultimately made me go back to InDesign was the handling of support assets and glitches as the catalog got more “heavy” with stuff.

I think I would have stuck with Affinity if I could go back and forth between Publisher/InDesign, but I couldn’t take what I started with and finish in the other app.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the reply. Makes sense. I haven’t had any jobs recently that would push us there.

CC is also priced low enough we can sign back up for a month if we need it.

One feature set of CC I’ll miss is the libraries functionality working across all the apps. Someone on the team needs a client asset in any app ? (AE/ID/PS/AI) There it is.

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 0 points 2 months ago

Is this one of those "yeah, we legally gave ourselves permission but trust us we won't use it" cases that also commonly happens in politics?