TechTakes

1489 readers

80 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

wow. sensible (awful.systems)

submitted 6 months ago by sc_griffith@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

cool graph what's the x axis

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 1 points 6 months ago

Bitcoin.

[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh ez, that's only 17 orders of magnitude!

If we managed an optimistic pace of doubling every year that'd only take.... 40 years. The last few survivors on desert world can ask it if it was worth it

[–] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Rather amusing prediction that despite the obscene amount of resources being spent on AI compute already, it's apparently reasonable to expect to spend 1,000,000x that in the "near future".

[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

What these people don't realize is you're never gonna get AGI by just feeding a machine an infinite amount of raw data.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You’re right. We should move onto feeding it orphans

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 1 points 6 months ago

Check out my new startup at modestproposal.ai

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Oh, that’s why the orphan crushing machine exists. Completely realistic, actually.