this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
190 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60216 readers
2352 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The second step, which we still need to evaluate because some companies want it, and others are more hesitant, is to allow Anatel to have access to the core routers to place a direct order on the router

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 53 points 3 days ago

I don't think these people understand routers ..

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“To place a direct order on the router”?? wtf does that even mean?

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

They figure ports and IP addresses that link or distribute wares can be globally blocked and that will solve their problem.

[–] april@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How do they think that will work if the data is encrypted? We even have encrypted DNS now.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Simple. After they gain access to the routers and realize everything is encrypted then they’ll start throwing piles of money at politicians to outlaw encryption.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Politicians finally figured out that everything not encrypted or with a backdoor is the same as giving everything to Chinese or Russian spies in a silver platter. It'll take very large piles of money now.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

So the copyright industry will push again for back doors that they are given the keys to.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

And let’s pretend for a second they can decrypt these packets. (Like let’s pretend they work with the CIA/NSA, who let’s say has some special key…) Even then, how are they going to determine that the sender and receiver do not have legit rights to own and/or transmit those bits? It’s fucking nuts.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 23 points 3 days ago

This pops up every couple of years. It goes nowhere because it won't work.

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 29 points 3 days ago

It worked fine for Italy /s

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's don't.. The internet is important to keep open for everybody, or we become just like China with their "Great Firewall"... Yea.. No thanks. When you go this route (pun intended), there is no going back, every industry would like to enforce bans on everything.

The control nexus points of the internet must have occasional cleansing burns to stop them becoming overgrown in our digital ecosystem. It is a permanent danger that any of these sites might become "to big to fail" and become corrupted by state actors. It's simple hygiene, this article is a symptom of the infection taking root.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

And here I am reading Doctorow's Pirate Cinema. How very timely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Cinema_(novel)

Lolol yeah right