this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
11 points (60.0% liked)

Linux

48766 readers
979 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
11
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Banthex to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

Would it be possible to have a linux DE with that high quality like macOS? The last 3 years i did a lot of distro hopping. Im really Happy with gnome and ubuntu now ( reason was the rocm Installation script for my 7900xtx). Currently i donate whenever i use a Software more frequent. So i also would pay for a such good Look like on an iMac from my wife. Currently i use 4k Resolution and coloring settings with my spyder color camera. Edit: Im talking about sharpness of font rendering

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So from some of your comments, it seems that by sharpness, you are referring to the sharpness of text in gnome on high resolution displays (4k in your case) when compared to macos or windows. Well in my experience, text rendering in Linux hasn't been as good as the macos or windows but it has been improving steadily. If I remember correctly, the differences lie in the anti aliasing done to text to make them sharper. Somebody please correct me if I am wrong.

Also maybe edit your post to mention that the high quality you are talking about is the sharpness of font rendering.

[–] Banthex 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks this was that im looking for.

[–] septick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Banthex 1 points 2 days ago

Did it a few times and was not happy, thanks. For gaming and rocm not good.

[–] gozz@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

As others have said, it is not entirely clear what you mean by sharp. Based on the rounded corner and button example you gave previously, I think it might just be the graphic design. MacOS has had a lot of time invested into its design language including subtle things like a thin, almost glass-like specular border around windows and then a drop shadow. This very much becomes a matter of taste in many cases, but for some it helps identify boundaries more precisely. Perhaps have a look at https://github.com/vinceliuice/WhiteSur-gtk-theme, which replicates MacOS as closely as possible. You may be able to experiment with it side by side and see if you can figure out exactly what design element it is that you are looking for.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago

Because it's not Plasma 6.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Because Linux doesnt compete with MacOS? Linux doesnt compete against any other OS because unlike Windows or MacOS, Linux isnt owned by a for-profit organization (Linux doesnt have something to sell). Gnome is driven by community efforts to polish a community maintained set of tools, I would say theyve done a very good job.

[–] Banthex 3 points 3 days ago

Indeed great work!

[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Gnome is just as beautiful as MacOS. The only difference is that MacOS is colorful, while Gnome is more b&w in its design. In fact, I'd say that gnome is more modern than macOS in its overall design philosophy. So modern, that some people hate it, lol. But modern nonetheless.

[–] Karmmah@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I recently started using the openbar extension which adds a lot of color to Gnome with just a few clicks.

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

I love Gnomes design btw. My second favorite after Android.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you want the MacOS experience, install Garuda. Personally, I hate that global menu, and the first thing I do on a fresh install is get rid of it, but if that's what you like...

It's KDE, not GNOME, though.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 4 days ago (11 children)

Sharp as, it looks blurry or sharp as, its not polished?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] helmet91@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I find Gnome smoother than macOS.

This wasn't the case many years ago, but now I find Gnome pretty good, the amount of bugs are surprisingly low.

On the other hand, I experience glitches on macOS regularly on the UI, especially on a multi-monitor setup (I use both Gnome and macOS with multiple monitors).

And generally feature-wise I find Gnome a lot more convenient to use in terms of window or workspace management.

[–] Ulrich 6 points 3 days ago (6 children)

On the other hand, I experience glitches on macOS regularly on the UI, especially on a multi-monitor setup (I use both Gnome and macOS with multiple monitors).

Multi monitor and window tiling on Mac are so bad, they should be embarrassed.

You have to click to switch monitors but if you do it twice it registers as a double click so you have to click....wait...then click again.

Sometimes you can drag windows from one screen to the other and other times they just...disappear as you drag then across.

You can't close anything from the window buttons and the red and yellow buttons do the same thing. You have to go into the taskbar and right click to close them.

Then they took the time in Sequoia to add window tiling but it's just such an awful experience. You have to hover over the green dot and wait for the prompt to popup and choose from a drop-down menu. WHY CAN'T YOU JUST DRAG AND DROP!?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Banthex 2 points 3 days ago

I had the same with macOS. Sometime, more often after updates i had several bugs. With gnome never.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

KDE Plasma may be a lot more customizable than Gnome, so you might be able to find something more like what you are looking for there. I would do a web search for varied examples if I were you.

You could search for more Gnome examples too. I believe Gnome requires more in the way of plugins for customization, so you might have to seek out examples of gnome plugins that customize look and feel or window styling. I'm just speculating here, I don't really know Gnome very well.

[–] Banthex 1 points 3 days ago

I will force me to test KDE for a longer therm. Thanks for the feedback.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

It was definitely Unity on Ubuntu plus Cairo dock that pulled me out of the Mac life way back in the early 10s, so I'm still sad Unity is gone and Lumiri is basically abandoned from the start. But these days I really like Plasma, as someone who considers the Windows 11 UI to look rather clean (gasp!)

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Look at the kde themes in the settings app.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Gnome emulates MacOS in the worst ways possible. See: all the whitespace in gtk apps.

[–] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are you using fractional scaling?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You won't get the same united look in Gnome as in mac OS. Applications will look a bit different and not exactly the same.

I think you get used to it though. I don't think about it at all anymore.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not really true if you just stick to modern GTK apps. Almost always if you find a program for a specific purpose using Qt (KDE graphical framework) someone's make a program for the exact same function. Is it basically pointless other than keeping theming and style consistent? Yes, but that's enough for me unless there truly is an essential function missing. Basically the only Qt application I use is Strawberry Music Player because it's extremely featureful.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

Depends on the usage though. While I prefer GTK over Qt as well, for me there are no GTK alternatives for Krita, Kate and Ghostwriter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] noodles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you tried theming gnome? There's a ton of videos on youtube if you're a beginner, i wonder if you'll have the same thoughts after theming it

[–] Banthex 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Please have a look at my current desktop. Bildschirmfoto-vom-2024-12-27-21-00-48.png

[–] Banthex 1 points 2 days ago

the corners look better in KDE then in gnome

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do yourself a favor and ditch GNOME for KDE. You'll be glad you did. Especially if you're into theming.

[–] Banthex 1 points 2 days ago

I did and the cornors really look better.

[–] Zeoic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I tried to do that a little while ago, but I just couldn't get used to the Menu on kde. Even with themes, it was miles behind ArcMenu on gnome.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I know what you're talking about. Is it the global menu?

[–] Zeoic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Ah, I only remember it being called the Menu lol. KDEs equivilent to a start menu in windows

load more comments
view more: next ›