this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

Chaotic Good

531 readers
1 users here now

A place to post examples of chaotic good actions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's a crime in Dallas to help homeless people?

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's what Jesus would want, didn't you know?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Supply-side Jesus is the worst Jesus.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's generally not allowed to create an ad hoc aid group. It's bullshit.

The "reasoning" is the are no permits/ food safety licenses, etc.

But obviously that's bullshit given the alternatives.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

We live in a world where I can see someone doing this in an effort to poison a bunch of homeless people. Of course that's not what is happening here but it's been at yhe back of my mind lately.

[–] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've been following some of these folks on social media who do this every couple of weeks. It's crazy. The police were arresting them for giving away food. So they went through the courts and won the right to feed homeless people. Crazy right. The even crazier part is the cops sit across the street every single time they give out free food and hygiene items and harass them, take photos and other ACAB sort of shit. 4-6 cruisers at a time. Insane.

Its only crazy if you don't want to look at why they're doing it square in the eye. Please don't get me wrong, I wouldn't judge anyone doing it, presuming it does apply a little you yourself. I could be wrong of course. The truth is very, very ugly and not something anyone would want to be true.

Despite their claims, the problem was never the cost to the government of feeding the homeless, as can be seen. The reason the police do this is that wage slaves won't be forced back into the worst, most poorly paid jobs we can find if they're not facing death by starvation.

It was the same in the UK, back when they made feeding the homeless illegal and the penalty being being homeless OR without a job for 3 days was being sent to the workhouse where you might well be worked to death.

Its the same thing, centuries apart.

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I had^1^ a friend in middle school who shared my name. We'd hang out together all the time and play Super Mario Bros 3 and ride our bikes all over and shit. Dude was chill. Then he went into the army, came out, and become a cop in Dallas PD.

^1^Had.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As a 2A liberal, I LOVE this. Black Panthers did it right, don't change what works!

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact: California's anti-gun culture was born out of racism and fear of the Black Panthers.

Ronald fucking Reagan started the anti-gun movement to disarm black people

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

And then continued it federally with bans on assault weapons and magazines over a certain capacity after someone tried to assassinate him.

I say we should bring back the Reagan approach on gun control.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

You love it? You don't look at this and think "This can't possibly be how a reasonable society works"?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

When it stops being illegal to help vulnerable people, I'll stop cheering for folks who open carry firearms to deter cops that might otherwise try to stop them.

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course most of us don't love it. A lot of us live in places where, due to concepts like gerrymandering, we have no political choice, so people have to resort to stuff like this. We love that people are fighting back, not that it has to be this way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You know you're on the wrong side of history when you make it illegal to give to those most in need.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And have to be visibly armed to stop the cops from harassing you for doing so.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

And people are banning books.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The black panther method, 10 outta 10

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yep. This is it.

And that’s a factor in generating early gun control laws, black people exercising their rights.

[–] danafest@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Armed to deter cops actually sounds like a viable plan in Texas after what we saw at Uvalde

[–] EmpeRohrOn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are you ok over there? Do you need something? Like healthcare and a social state?

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Damn, giving food and clothes is a crime.

[–] Sendpicsofsandwiches@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's food serving legislation being taken too far. The clothes I think are fine, but since they're not inspected by the health department like a restaurant the government can technically shut it down which is complete bullshit.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

No, the Good Samaritan Act says free food doesn't have to be inspected as long as it's given "in good faith apparently wholesome food or apparently fit grocery products to a nonprofit organization for ultimate distribution to needy individuals"

https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2020/08/13/good-samaritan-act-provides-liability-protection-food-donations

All fifty states and the District of Columbia have additional food donation statues that limit food donor’s liability—these currently vary widely, such as by who (i.e., donors, nonprofit organizations), and what foods and food products are covered.

state laws may provide greater protection against liability, but not less

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

TIL. Thanks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure its not, this is just more bullshit lemmy propaganda.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look up how many times "Food Not Bombs" gets arrested for feeding the homeless.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

More like look up what OP says and realize its bullshit. Lemmy has become so disappointing with all the blind acceptance of this kind of nonsense.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So this video is manufactured “bullshit”, I assume.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Show me the law saying feeding homeless people is a crime

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This article talks about the ordinance. Yes, you can feed them in specific situations and places. Still, you can’t tell me it isn’t making it intentionally hard to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Now I understand why americans need guns.

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I mean, that was always the point.

To fight tyrannical bullshit.

It's just that purist assholes don't want any regulation whatsoever - so that anyone, anyone can get a gun. And welp.... the tragic bullshit happens.

I'm not pro-gun or anti-gun. I'm pro-common-sense.

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›