this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
740 points (95.9% liked)

Comic Strips

12953 readers
2639 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Is that what we call a joint venture?

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Krampus should the entire US healthcare industry.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I see Luigi isn't on the naughty list. Based Santa.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

No wonder coal as a fossil fuel isn’t going away. The rich folk get so much during Christmas!

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Forgot the health insurance company CEOs.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, Elon is on that list 7 times.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What makes you think he puts the cart away?

[–] Verdorrterpunkt 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What makes you think he ever uses carts?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] strawberrysocial@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Many of my landlords were pretty decent people who actually cared about their tenants tho.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

There are honest people out there. Unfortunately, it's a drip of water in the ocean.

[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget how many apartment buildings are owned by corporate landlords though. Western Canada has a huuuge problem with the slumlord billionaires at Mainstreet and others.

The out-of-date data I can find has 35% of BC apartments as investor-owned.

[–] strawberrysocial@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I guess that's likely the difference. With the big company owned apartments you usually deal with a super intendant or building manager instead of the landlord directly. So the renter is seen as a faceless number rather than an actual person to the owners you are paying money to. There's a lack of empathy towards the renter.

[–] slartibartfast@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that why they stole their money?

[–] strawberrysocial@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Stole whose money? My money? My stove broke, they replaced it, pest issue, they paid for the exterminator, roof leaking, they paid for it to be fixed, many other examples but you get the idea. I didn't pay utilities in some places. I've had bad landlords and I moved house because of them and didn't do them any favours when I left. The good ones I made sure I was a good tenant for. I think a lot of renters don't understand how expensive owning a place is with upkeep. We wouldn't be able to replace a furnace or roof repair and all that jazz in our income bracket.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Landlords buy an essential good just so they can squeeze money out of their renters. Housing should never be seen as an investment, yet these parasites do.

[–] gimsy@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is a huge difference between a private owner, and a corporation. Anyhow they might have a common approach, I would say estate ownership should be limited to a certain number through incremental taxation the more you own the larger the tax bracket, like we do for income

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Problem with that is they'll charge even more and then the people never see that tax money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] slartibartfast@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you suggesting landlords make zero profit off of the property?

The money we put in is more than the cost of the exterminator, roof not-leaking, many other examples but you get the idea.

[–] strawberrysocial@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, I'm not suggesting that at all. Don't know why you are suggesting I am?

The benefits of renting is that we are too poor, we do not have emergency funds to buy a new stove or what have you, but we are able to afford monthly rent. Repairs and stuff, that falls on the landlords. They charge an amount that will cover the cost of any repairs or appliance or plumbing replacements in the future, along with (if they don't own the house outright) their mortgage payments on the house.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right, you're using them as insurance. You give them money, they pool cash you literally can't get because the system is out to crush you, and on the off chance something goes wrong they take a small hit to their profiting from your suffering.

This is especially a funny take from a Canadian considering the reason your rent is high is rich people who can easily get more capital are buying up real estate with the sole purpose of raising prices without providing any additional service.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 18 hours ago

poor landlords. they should just sell.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The beauty of this is you'd be able to afford all of these if wages and housing costs were reasonable. The rich are the cause of both issues.

[–] strawberrysocial@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's true, the rich truly are the issue largely. My good landlord(s) aren't though and they were never what I would consider rich. Just doing slightly better than me at the time. And I got to benefit from their slightly above me income bracket. I think it's easier in smaller towns and cities than the big places like Vancouver Toronto and such though. The housing costs and rental costs are insane there. Go to places like Thunder Bay and it's a lot more affordable.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So long as politicians are all painted with the same negative brush, there's no room for anyone with a genuine interest in improving things. There are some truly great, caring people in politics working hard to do the right thing. It's not their fault the public keeps voting for assholes.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 day ago

I've often felt that genuine politicians can't possibly have it easy.

To even get started, step one is getting in bed with social media.

[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Freaking people who leave their carts in a parking spot… Straight to the top of the list!

[–] einkorn 36 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Over here in Germany using a shopping cart "costs" between 50 Cents and 2 €. You have to put a coin in them to release the chain by which they are attached to eachother. Of course when you return the cart and close the lock you get your coin back.

Little metal plates without monetary value but still the right size are common marketing gifts by companies and organizations yet they still provide mostly the same unconscious effect of "I want my coin back".

Of course there are also people who use little gadgets to unlock the carts without putting anything in but I wouldnt know about such things...

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 22 hours ago

It can cost much less than 50 cents

0.5 RON can be used, which are about 10 cents. You can also use fake plastic coins

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›