this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
683 points (99.3% liked)

Games

16936 readers
315 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I recently played it. If anything I think it has a subtle anti-gambling message.

The more hands you play, the more you realize you can't actually win without "cheating"

Play it like poker? Congrats, you're fucked, you literally cannot win against the blind.

Stack the deck in your favor with creative use of Joker cards and a few dozen extra aces? The game becomes trivial

If the game teaches you anything it's that if you play by the rules, the house will ALWAYS win.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 minutes ago

I just played it last night, and then again today with my kids watching. I explained how the hands are scored, and they seemed to get the gist of it.

It has absolutely nothing to do with gambling. You don't wager anything, there's no opponents, and the terminology is all different, for example:

  • blind - in poker, it's a forced bet based on sitting position from the dealer; in Balatro, it's where you're at in the "level" (and only the "boss blind" is required)
  • ante - in poker, it's the minimum bet to participate; in Balatro, it's the level you're on
  • hand - in poker, it's the cards you are dealt, and you play them all; in Balatro, it's a scoring action, and you only play a subset of your cards in a given "hand"

And so on. The only thing that's actually similar is the hand scoring system, but you mess with that as well with buffs and whatnot. Balatro will make you a worse poker player, and not even teach you the rules.

I don't think it's anti-gambling, it has nothing to do with gambling. It's like saying solitaire and blackjack are similar because they both use playing cards...

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 16 hours ago

Would love to see thr EFF branch out and take this on. Great opportunity to set precedence.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Why don't people reach out to "Dirk Bosmans, Director General PEGI S.A."?

PEGI isn't a living creature. PEGI isn't giving out biased ratings. It's the people working there, and the person in charge. Actual people that actually exist here on this planet with us. "Talking" to a company is imaginary bullshit.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter in the slightest.

me, age 12, San Andreas

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

18 is the highest rating. It's equivalent to the ESRB "AO" rating, and many storefronts will not sell it, period.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter to a kid with a phone and unlimited time and willpower. I know with 100% certainty, if I was 16 and wanted to play Balatro, I wouldn't be talking to you, I'd have an .apk already.

Storefront? Lmao.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Piracy being the only way to get a game isn't beneficial to the dev, and Balatro is the kind of game that deserves our money. It could have easily been jammed to the gill with paid boosts premium decks, etc, but instead, they just made a good game.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago

I went looking for a patreon or donation page... Guys who get hit with this should just go that route. He doesn't have a general one up.

We can't control the bullshit, but we can side-step it.

[–] simonced@lemmy.one 75 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Tell me you are corrupted to the core, without telling me you are corrupted to the core.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] spireghost@lemmy.zip 117 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The reasoning in question:

This game teaches - by way of images, information and gameplay - skills and knowledge that are used in poker. During gameplay, the player is rewarded with ‘chips’ for playing certain hands. The player is able to access a list of poker hand names. As the player hovers over these poker hands, the game explains what types of cards the player would need in order to play certain hands. As the game goes on, the player becomes increasingly familiar with which hands would earn more points. Because these are hands that exist in the real world, this knowledge and skill could be transferred to a real-life game of poker

So, this game teaches skills and knowledge that are used in poker. The skills in knowledge are limited to... playing and making poker hands. That's it. Also, "as the game goes on, the player becomes increasingly familiar with which hands would earn more points" -- is hilariously funny. The idea that knowledge of what a poker hand is is anything related to the dangers of gambling is ridiculous.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder what they rated Pavlov VR, ya know the FPS game in VR that forces you to handle guns the way they would in real life and is popular with ex-military because of their transferrable skills?

[–] spireghost@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

I mean that would definitely get an 18 rating, I'm not sure what you are meaning to say

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

My thief archer build in Morrowind and Skyrim lead me to a life of thievery and now I'm serving a life sentence at maxium security prison. Very sound logic.

[–] Laser 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's really dumb if you know the two games (poker and Balatro).

Poker is a game of incomplete information where you need one single higher ranked hand than your opponent per round. The stakes are money you bet that your hand is better. Bluffing is an important part of the game.

Balatro is mostly a game with complete information (apart from the order of remaining cards in your deck and certain bosses that flip your cards). You bet no money. There is no bluffing. Money does not correlate to chips. It is about the rating of your hand (poker has no rating, only relative ranking). You play multiple hands. You can't fold. Bluffing doesn't exist. Cards can be improved, ratings can be improved, the decks can look nothing like poker decks, etc.

[–] scbasteve7@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One "teaches" you to gamble, the other allows you to gamble. And the one that just teaches you has a higher rating. Crazy.

[–] GreenAppleTree@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Totally his fault for not heeding the ancient warning.

Give a man a fish, you get PEGI 3+. Teach a man to fish, 18+ you sucker.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (7 children)

As the game goes on, the poker hands also get increasingly unrealistic and different from real poker including things like five of a kind, and a pair being worth more than a royal flush.

If you tried to take the skills you learn from balatro to a poker table you would get kicked out basically immediately.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago

I had a run where I legitimately had to stop and compare the point values a Two Pair Vs. One Pair Vs. Straight Flush

And ONE PAIR wound up being the one with the highest point value...

I was still 600 dollars short of winning against the Boss Blind, ending my run

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I place a torn up joker on the table, a tarot card, a llanowar elf card, and a pair of threes

"So with my score multiplier basically I own the casino."

The dealer frantically calls security

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

"This is worth eighteen bazillion chips. Here is five dollars."

[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

"I'm sorry, the Llanowar Elves are banned, you should keep up with the meta" Activates the Pot of Greed and draw two.

[–] Localhorst86 15 points 1 day ago

"Sir, you can't bring stone slabs to the table and play them as if they were cards. Also, where did these glass shards come from?"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I know this is anecdotal but I'm now living in a ditch because of Balatro. I never gambled before in my life and all the poker knowledge Balatro me taught caused me to start extreme gambling and now I'm dead in a ditch.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 177 points 2 days ago (15 children)

If you search for "poker" on PEGI's site, it seems that many games which are actually about simulated gambling are rated 12 or 16. They seem to think Balatro is more likely to expose children to realistic gambling than, say, Prominence Poker or Pure Hold'em World Poker Championship, which seems completely bizarre, given that those games are about playing poker and Balatro is a fancy kind of solitaire with no betting.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 16 hours ago

It's clearly market manipulation.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The pathetic thing is games of the ilk of balatro and luck be a landlord (also OG peggle) are actually the kind of game that plays with your gambling impulses but in a healthy and fun way, these games should be celebrated for subverting the language of gambling to make something beautiful, how pathetic to have so little actual understanding of video games and yet have this kind of power to impact the industry.

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've always suspected I might be susceptible to gambling addiction so I stay out of casinos.

Instead, I go to the arcade. Which is like a low stakes child casino. Win a bunch of tickets and then either buy something stupid with them, or, just straight give them to some kid.

My point being, we've specifically constructed casino-like facilities for children and it's regularly accepted, so why should Balatro be different?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 296 points 2 days ago (11 children)

It's entirely his fault for not being a multi-billion dollar company which actively invests in better ratings. In capitalism, there is no fairness - there is only money.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 80 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Is the rating purely because it uses playing cards? Poker hands?

Yahtzee and literal poker with betting are included in Nintendo clubhouse/worldwide 51 and it's rated Pegi-12.

Would balatro get a pass if it used cards numbered 1-13 instead of traditional cards?

This whole thing is bonkers.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 181 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

One looks like gambling but is actually a fun roguelite card game, the other one looks like fun but is actually a gambling game. Guess which one is rated 18+?

spoilerOkay I lied, FC24 doesn't even look like fun, but that's my personal opinion.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Actual gambling - 3+

Suggestion of gambling - 18+

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there are actual poker games that are rated lower than 18 too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›