this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40696 readers
310 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I make use of sharedrop.io to quickly share files between phones and computers on my LAN. Does anyone know of a self-hosted alternative, preferably containerised with Docker?

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lrobie@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I use Pairdrop. It can be deployed using docker.

That may well be the thing I'm looking for, thanks for the pointer!

[–] fredrik@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is LocalSend a viable option, even though it is not containerized?

Share files to nearby devices. Free, open-source, cross-platform.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 4 points 2 weeks ago

This is what I need.

If you only need to drop files on the same LAN, then you really don't need a server. P2P is perfect and cuts out the middle man.

[–] Lantern@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I use Tailscale (Taildrop & Taildrive) to send files between my devices no matter where I am. It’s a very simple install (maybe 10 minutes total), and just works.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nextcloud has file sharing i just use KDE Connect though.

KDE Connect is a great idea, thanks!

[–] dudenas@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I also just use KDE connect on windows to exchange needed files or clipboard. Devices need to be on same LAN or VPN during exchange. Pausing PC media during calls is a nice bonus.

For syncing photo gallery and Obsidian I use Syncthing.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sharedrop is self hostable.

Other, serverless solutions are

  • Warpinator
  • Localsend
  • Croc
  • Syncthing (for the organised background syncer in your life)
[–] sardaukar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Needs Firebase to self host, though

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 2 weeks ago

I see. That sucks.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Ambrotos@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thumbs up for snapdrop. I've tried a few alternatives, and this was the easiest to get working through a reverse proxy.

I also use microbin for sharing things not on my LAN.

[–] pax0707@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Tried a few, settled on Pairdrop for myself.

[–] eodur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

An easy option is VaultWarden. Pretty painless to host AND it'll store your passwords. There are probably better dedicated tools, but it's functionality is pretty solid.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I saw sharrr the other day which apparently can be self hosted and uses cryptography / expiracy / single download / multi part downloads to make it hard to find a compete file if an attacker even has host access, it also encrypts the file prior to uploading to the server and only you on the client side have the encryption.

That said, this is all according to the architecture of the service, not sure about security in practice.

[–] MartinH@social.cologne 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] a@91268476.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@icerunner_origin@startrek.website Sharedrop is open source and looks easily selfhosteable, I don't understand why you can run it on your own?

[–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You don't understand because I didn't state why 😅 I have enough time and energy to set up and manage containerised applications. 20 years ago I might have had the drive to set up a local dev version, manage the dependencies and set up local init scripts, but not anymore.

[–] a@91268476.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago

@icerunner_origin@startrek.website Yeah, I get it. Maybe it is a bit trickier, but I see a Dockerfile in the repository, so maybe you need to build an image before deployment.

Sometimes people rely on third party infrastructure and that sucks for self hosting projects, but it seems this is not the case